Explaining Q3 After TED Link: 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a TED video that explores misconceptions about solar energy and the angle of incidence of sunlight. The user successfully answered the first two questions but struggled with the explanations for the third and fourth questions, particularly regarding the angle of incidence and its impact on energy received from the sun. It is noted that as the sun's position lowers in the sky, especially during winter in polar regions, the angle of incidence decreases, resulting in less energy reaching the Earth's surface. The conversation concludes with the user moving the video link to the appropriate TED thread and suggesting the current thread be deleted.
WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
After the link to TED was posted a few threads below, I began to browse through the videos and I found this one which I liked a lot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hJCxSiH4ts&feature=channel_page

I got questions 1 and 2 right. But the 3rd and 4th questions wrong and along the lines of the misconceptions he was referring to. I understood 4 myself but his explanation for 3 was a bit brief and I'm not sure I got it. Could someone explain the answer to Q3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you just put this video in the TED thread?
 
It is the angle of incidence that make the difference. As the sun gets lower in the sky, the angle of incidence is smaller, so the total energy received is smaller than in the summer when the sun is nearly directly overhead. Note that in the arctic, in the winter, the most extreme example of winter, the suns rays are striking the Earth at almost glancing angles.

The total energy received over a fixed interval goes as the dot product of the vector representing the sun's rays, and the area vector of the Earth's surface, at any point.
 
Last edited:
Cyrus said:
Why don't you just put this video in the TED thread?

Alright. I shall do that.

EDIT: I have done so. The mods can delete this thread now.
 
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top