Why is there a doubt in Coulomb's formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikromancer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Formula
AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's formula describes the force between two charged bodies as F = k(q1*q2/d^2), where k is a constant. The confusion arises from interpreting the sign of the force; like charges repel while unlike charges attract. The formula provides only the magnitude of the force, not its direction. The full vector form clarifies that the force is repulsive for like charges and attractive for unlike charges. Understanding the vector notation is crucial for correctly interpreting the nature of the force in different scenarios.
nikromancer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Coulomb's formula states that the force of attraction between two electrically charged bodies is k(q1*q2/d^2), where k is 9*10^9 Nm^2/C^2. However, I have a doubt regarding this.
We know that like charges repel and unlike charges attract. Let us take the case of like charges first. If both q1 and q2 are like charges, the value of q1*q2 will be positive. As d and k are also positive, the force of attraction will also be positive. However, this means that like charges ATTRACT each other rather than repel. Similarly, if q1 and q2 are unlike charges, then the force of attraction will be negative and this means that unlike charges repel and like charges attract. But this isn't true.
So, shouldn't the formula be F= -k(q1*q2/d^2) or |F|=k(|q1*q2|/d^2)?? Please clarify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula you give only gives the magnitude of the force, not the direction.

The full (vector) form giving the force on charge 1 is
k {q_1q_2 \over r^2}\mathbf{\hat{r}}_{21}
where \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{21} is the vector pointing from charge 2 to charge 1. So if the charges are like, then the force vector will point along this vector, meaning it is repulsive.
 
You shouldn't interpret F as the force of attraction. The F in Coulomb's law is simply THE force charge 1 exerts on charge 2. If it is negative, it will be attractive (in the direction to make the distance between chages decrease) and if it is positive, it will be repulsive.

The notation you are using can confuse whether the force is attractive or not. The unambiguous way of writing coulomb's law is with vector notation (3 dimensions):

The force charge 1 exerts on charge 2 is

\vec F = K \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}\hat r
where \hat r is the unit vector from q1 to q2 (i.e. \vec r_2-\vec r_1).

In one dimension, you can work with signs, but you have to take care with the directions.

F = K(q_1q_2/d^3) * (x2-x1), where (x2-x1) is the signed distance x2-x1. So if x2>x1, then x2-x_1=d and the force is Kq_1q_2/d^2. This is positive for like charges, to the force is such that x_2 tends to increase (repellant). Figure out the other cases yourself.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top