Coupled damped harmonic oscillator

In summary: They are the equivalent of inductors, capacitors, and resistors in an electrical circuit.The first thing to do is to identify the dominant resonant frequencies for the system (or at least for the springs and joints). This will help you to choose the appropriate spring/joint combinations. After you have the dominant resonant frequencies you can use statistical/numerical models to calculate the coupling coefficients.
  • #1
Krampus
5
0
Hi everyone,

I'm dealing with system identification for the first time in my life and am in desperate need of help :) The system is spring-mounted and I'm analyzing the vertical and torsional displacements. However, it seems like the vertical and torsional oscillations are coupled (shouldn't be in theory..). So I want to create a model that takes this coupling into account. However this turned out to be much harder than I first thought...

The classical damped harmonic oscillator
x" + 2*gamma*x' + omega_0^2*x = 0 (1)

can be rewritten as:
x(t) = A*exp(-gamma*t)*cos(omega*t + phi) (2)
if omega_0^2 > gamma^2, (omega=sqrt(omega_0^2-gamma^2))

I'm supposing a coupled system between vertical and torsional oscillations would look something like this:
h" + 2*gamma*h' + omega_0^2*h + k1*a' + k2*a = 0 (3)
a" + 2*gamma*a' + omega_0^2*a + k3*h' + k4*h = 0 (4)

where k1, k2, k3 and k4 are coupling coeff.

But from here I have no idea how to continue... The main goal is of course to determine the coupling coeff and validating the model with experiment data. Does anyone have any suggestions of how to determine the coupling coeff? Or know how to express (3) and (4) as h(t) and a(t)? Furthermore I'm not sure that eqs (3) and (4) are the best to describe this coupled system... Any suggestions at this point are highly appreciated!

Thanks,
Maria
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What type of spring configuration is responsible for the motion? It seems to me you either need a model based on the geometry and properties of the actual device, or you need a statistical/numerical model that can extract a coupling factor from measured data.
 
  • #3
The system is a sectional bridge deck model, similar to the one found here (figure 3):
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/sadhana/3/00000182.pdf"

I want to create a model based on measured data but with parameters that have physical meaning.

I've done vertical and torsional step responses. From the frequency domains it is easy to detect the natural frequencies but there are some other disturbing peeks that should not be there... Some of them I consider to be noise, but one (at least) is to big to be noise and I want to find some sort of physical meaning to it... To begin this investigation I wanted to see if there is coupling between the torsional and vertical oscillations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
My background is EE but I've been doing some basic simulator work. It looks like there are four helical springs above and four below the deck.

First question, does a helical spring inject a torque on when it compresses? My intuition says it does unless there is decoupling provided at the joint of the spring with the deck. So in terms of physical models I'd look into that, then run a simulator with a simplified system to get some insight.

Sorry if I'm missing your point ...

Also another thought ... if the actual spring rates are poorly matched I wonder if the vertical displacements might then couple torsional oscilations, or something to that effect?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thank you for your reply System Theory,

I think you have a point about the spring configuration causing disturbances in the frequency domain (I hope this was your point...). I've plans to improve the physical model by installing a joint where the springs are attached. I'm hoping that this will lessen or remove some peaks.

However, if there still are unignorable peaks left I might want to expand the model so that it includes them. Since my first post I have though realized that the equations I proposed for coupling are only capable of producing peaks at the natural frequencies (the disturbing ones I have are not at the natural frequency or a multiple of it...).

So what I would want to know (even if it proves to be unnecessary after my model improvements, it would still be interesting) is how, if there is some general equation for it, to describe this type of "coupled" system. With "coupled" I mean that there are frequency peaks other than the natural ones that are repeated in both the vertical and torsional the frequency domains. This shows that there is a clear dependence, but how to describe it?
 
  • #6
If time and budget permit, I would first create a rig to measure the coupling or lack thereof of torque with compression or elongation of a single spring, using a rig that permits testing of different joint methods to the deck.

Next consider whether an imbalance in the linear spring characteristics or torque coupling characteristics creates an oscillation at some frequency (probably using the model for a single spring/joint combination in a computer simulator for rapid feedback).

In an electrical circuit analog springs are like inductors, mass is like a capacitor, and damping is like an lossy conductor, and when you put these elements in series/parallel configurations, the imbalances between actual device values become significant. So I'm assuming parameter imbalance may be causing a frequency in your noise signal ...

Personally my math skills would not permit a differential equation solution for eight springs in series/parallel with so many degrees of freedom and torsional coupling ... I'd end up chasing my tail in the math. DYNAST shell is one tool I use but I use it for much simpler systems than yours.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Another question, doesn't the flow of air past an object cause oscillations that could account for your results? For example, an open jacket on a motorcycle rider flaps up and down on each side at a natural frequency due to alternations in shedding a vortex. The back end of a big rig has a side to side (and perhaps torsional coupling) as the vortex sheds on one side, then the other, in a cyclic process, if I'm not mistaken. Hope that is useful as I don't know your exact problem ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex
 

1. What is a coupled damped harmonic oscillator?

A coupled damped harmonic oscillator is a physical system that consists of two or more oscillators that are connected to each other and experience damping forces. These oscillators are characterized by their ability to move back and forth in a periodic motion around a central equilibrium point.

2. How does damping affect the behavior of a coupled harmonic oscillator?

Damping is a force that opposes the motion of an oscillator, causing it to lose energy and decrease its amplitude over time. In a coupled harmonic oscillator system, damping can lead to energy transfer between the oscillators, resulting in changes in their amplitudes and frequencies.

3. What is the difference between a coupled and uncoupled harmonic oscillator?

In an uncoupled harmonic oscillator system, each oscillator behaves independently and is not affected by the motion of the others. In a coupled system, the oscillators are connected and their motion is influenced by each other's movement, leading to more complex behaviors.

4. How do you mathematically model a coupled damped harmonic oscillator?

A coupled damped harmonic oscillator can be represented by a set of coupled differential equations, such as the coupled spring-mass system or the electrical circuit with multiple capacitors and inductors. These equations take into account the forces and damping factors acting on each oscillator to describe its motion.

5. What are some real-life examples of coupled damped harmonic oscillators?

Coupled damped harmonic oscillators can be found in various physical systems, such as pendulum clocks, musical instruments, and seismometers. They can also be observed in biological systems, such as the synchronized movement of fireflies or the beating of cilia in cells.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
966
Replies
3
Views
987
  • Classical Physics
4
Replies
131
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
354
Replies
7
Views
627
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top