Covariant and Contravariant Vectors

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
vaibhavtewari
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,

while reading about schwarzschild geometry, I learned that [tex]E=-p_0[/tex] and [tex]L=p_{\phi}[/tex] are constant along a geodesic or are constant of motion. I further read that [tex]p^0=g^{00}p_0=m(1-2M/r)^{-1}E[/tex] and [tex]p^{\phi}=g^{\phi\phi}p_{\phi}=m(1/r^2)L[/tex], which I can see depends on radius r. This made me think that I don't really understand covariant and contravariat vectors well as I though they ought both be constant of motion.

I will be glad if someone can give a insightful description on how to understand this so that I don't run into conflicts again. I am sure this will help other physicist too.

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!,

It's cool someone else is cruisin PF on Sunday afternoon...

As I am looking over my GR textbook through the Schwarzschild Metric chapter, i find the following definition:

"The Schwarzschild coordinate [tex]r[/tex] has a simple geometric interpretation arising from spherical symmetry. It is not the distance from any "center". Rather it is related to the area [tex]A[/tex] of the two dimensional sphere of fixed [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]t[/tex] by the standard formula [tex]r=(A/4\pi)^{1/2}[/tex]."

This is from Hartle's book.
 
Thankyou for pointing out that, though all I pointed out was why covariant vector is a constant and contravariant not. I believe we can have frame work when contavariant is constant but contravariant not.

So I was sort of confused how to truly understand this ambiguity.
 
If the momentum 4-vector is [itex]p^\mu=(p^0,0,0,p^\phi)[/itex] then [itex]dr/d\tau[/itex] is zero and the 'r' in your formulae is a constant. To put it another way, E and p are only constants of motion for fixed radius in this orbit.
 
Thankyou very much for explaining, I relaize I was missing such a crucial point. Thanks again.
 
Thankyou for adding, it did help more..