Create Electron from Proton Annihilation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaketodd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
Search for the text "APEX collaboration at Fermilab" on the following page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiproton

It seems to indicate after that text that an antiproton can turn into an electron and gamma ray. However, before that it says "300,000 yr." So is it saying that it will take that long for that to happen? Is there a faster way to create a "new" electron?

Hmm, it says "...antiproton-proton annihilation into electron-positron pair..." on the following page:
http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/3577/

Is that true; can you create a new electron from the annihilation of a proton?

Thanks,

Jake
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's wrong with the standard old, true-and-tested pair production?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
What's wrong with the standard old, true-and-tested pair production?

Zz.

Are you referring to proton-antiproton annihilation to produce a "new" electron?

Thanks,

Jake
 
jaketodd said:
Are you referring to proton-antiproton annihilation to produce a "new" electron?

Thanks,

Jake

Pair production - production of electron-positron pairs out of gamma rays.

Zz.
 
jaketodd said:
Search for the text "APEX collaboration at Fermilab" on the following page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiproton

It seems to indicate after that text that an antiproton can turn into an electron and gamma ray. However, before that it says "300,000 yr." So is it saying that it will take that long for that to happen?

In the context of the preceding paragraph, I'm pretty sure that this is a lower limit on the antiproton lifetime. That is, the experiment didn't actually see any antiprotons decay; but based on the number of antiprotons involved and the time duration of the experiment, if the antiproton has a lifetime greater than 300,000 yr they wouldn't have been able to detect any antiprotons decaying anyway.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top