Creating a Computer-Controlled Lunar Lander

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidSnider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lunar Model
AI Thread Summary
Developing a small-scale computer-controlled lunar lander is feasible but presents significant challenges, particularly regarding the choice of propulsion. While high-powered rockets are not necessary, alternatives like jet engines or props could be considered, though they may complicate the design. The complexity of building a liquid rocket engine makes the project more suitable for a multidisciplinary engineering team rather than an individual. Expertise in aerospace and computer engineering is crucial, as the project requires extensive knowledge and hundreds of hours of work. Overall, while possible, the endeavor demands considerable resources and technical skill.
DavidSnider
Gold Member
Messages
511
Reaction score
147
Model "Lunar Lander"

How hard do you think it would be to develop a small scale computer controlled vertical take-off and landing machine?

Do you think it could be done without using extremely high powered rockets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How "hard" it is depends on your level of expertise and your resources. If you have $50 million dollars and a hundred engineers and technicians at your disposal, it should be a piece of cake!

And yes, it can certainly be done with jet engines or props.
 


No I'm thinking more like a toy. Like a computer controlled RC helicopter except using some other form of lift than propss... I dunno, probably not possible.
 


Oh, well on that scale it may be possible, though building even a small liquid rocket engine is not for the faint of heart. I would consider that type of project to be about the right level for a multidisciplinary undergraduate engineering senior design team project. For an individual, though, pretty difficult - hundreds of hours of work and a lot to learn unless you are already an accomplished aerospace engineer and computer engineer.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top