Creating a Website for Your Business

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjson775
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Business
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the value of n for the outer electron in the ground state of an atom. A participant points out an error in the calculation related to a missing negative sign. They suggest a method to simplify the problem by substituting variables to avoid solving a general quadratic equation. This approach leads to a straightforward solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful calculations in determining electron configurations.
jjson775
Messages
112
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
When the outermost electron of an alkali atom is excited, it is found that states with the same n but different l have slightly different energies because they penetrate into the core to different degrees. Low l orbitals penetrate more, while higher l orbitals penetrate less. The wavelengths of absorption lines are given approximately by the equation below.

Observe that it is like the equation that describes hydrogen but with the principal quantum numbers replaced by effective quantum numbers. Here delta l is the “quantum defect” associated with orbital quantum number l. The value of delta l is independent of n. For sodium Na delta 0 = 1.35. The longest wavelength for an absorption transition carrying Na from its ground state to a state with higher principal quantum number is 330 no. A) For what other value of l can you determine the quantum defect and B) what is the value of that defect.
Relevant Equations
See below
1603729882382.png
F412EF60-CE2C-445A-82D8-A55088D3552F.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the value of n for the outer electron in the ground state?

Looks like you dropped a negative sign about halfway through your calculation.

You can avoid solving a general quadratic equation by letting ##x = n'-\delta_{l'}## and first solving for ##x##.
 
Last edited:
That’s it, a simple solution. Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top