Creating Redox Table: Identifying Oxidizing/Reducing Agents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alain12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox Table
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a redox table to identify oxidizing and reducing agents from given spontaneous reactions. The user understands how to write half-reaction equations but is unsure how to arrange them in terms of their relative strengths. It is suggested to list the half-reactions in order of their tendency to be reduced, starting with palladium as the strongest oxidizing agent. The importance of comparing results with a table of reduction potentials is emphasized for accuracy. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding redox reactions and their respective agents.
Alain12345
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a chemistry assignment that involves creating redox tables. The explanation in the textbook isn't a very good one and I can't find my answer through google either :mad:

Here's the problem:

The following equations represent spontaneous reactions. From this evidence, set up a table of relative strengths of oxidizing and reducing agents. Write half-reaction equations and label the strongest oxidizing agent and reducing agent.

Co(s) + Pd2+(aq) --->spont. Co2+(aq) + Pd(s)

Pd(s) + Pt2+ (aq) --->spont. Pd2+(aq) + Pt(s)

Mg(s) + Co2+(aq) ---> spont. Mg2+(aq) + Co(s)

I know how to make the half reactions and how to identify the oxidizing agent and reducing agent in each reaction, but I'm confused about what to do after that. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to arrange each half reaction into REDUCTION half reactions.
Look then at your first reaction between Co and Pd. Palladium wants to be reduced more than does Cobalt.

Start making a list putting the items that want to be reduced in decreasing "want to be reduced". For the first equation and its half reactions, you would show:

Pd(+2) + 2 e ---> Pd
Co(+2) + 2 e ---> Co

Next, write the half reactions for Pd (which you already did) and of Pt. Now, how does Pt compare in relation to the first two reductions that you wrote for Pd and Co?

Continue this process.

One more thing: Did anyone tell you NOT to check in a table of reduction potentials? When you are done, you should compare your results with the positions of the half reactions in the table of reduction potentials.
 
As of the above, it's been a long time since I last saw that stuff, so someone may need to check what I said more carefully.
 
I am hoping someone can check the explanation above =).. please and thank you!~
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top