A Creation and annihilation operator

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sebas4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Qft
Sebas4
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Does the annihilation/creation operator on the complex exponent?
Hey, I have a short question.
The quantized field in Schrödinger picture is given by:
\hat{\phi} \left(\textbf{x}\right) =\int \frac{d^{3}p}{\left(2\pi\right)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\omega_{2\textbf{p}}}}\left(\hat{a}_{\textbf{p}}e^{i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} + \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\textbf{p}}e^{-i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}}\right)

My question is, does the the annihilation \hat{a}_{\textbf{p}} and creation \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\textbf{p}} operator act on e^{i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} and e^{-i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} respectively? In other words: does the annihilation/creation operator on the complex exponent?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sebas4 said:
does the the annihilation a^p and creation a^p† operator act on eip⋅x and e−ip⋅x respectively?

No.
 
Well, it does in the sense that ##a## and ##a^\dagger## commute with these factors.
 
No, they don't. The creation and annihilation operators are linear operators defined in the Fock space. The expeonential functions are numbers; ##\vec{x}, \vec{p} \in \mathbb{R}^3##.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top