Creation and annihilation operators

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
In one dimensional problems in QM only in case of the potential ##V(x)=\frac{m\omega^2x^2}{2}## creation and annihilation operator is defined. Why? Why we couldn't define same similar operators in cases of other potentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
In one dimensional problems in QM only in case of the potential ##V(x)=\frac{m\omega^2x^2}{2}## creation and annihilation operator is defined. Why? Why we couldn't define same similar operators in cases of other potentials?

I guess mathematics wouldn't work and you would not be able to reduce those operators into entities with commutation operators leading to simple algebraic relations. Plus this harmonic potential corresponds to free fields, and this "freeness" i guess is the physical reason why things are simple and tractable and meaningful.
 
Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem. Also the n-dimensional harmonic oscillator. In principle such operators always exist, but only in a few problems are they simple enough to write down in useful form.
 
Bill_K said:
Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem. Also the n-dimensional harmonic oscillator. In principle such operators always exist, but only in a few problems are they simple enough to write down in useful form.


I suppose that. That they always could be written. But why we that speak about phonons only in that problem. Why we don't give a name of excited states in some other problem.

Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem.
Do you have reference for this?
 
The stepping operators for the H atom form the generators of an SO(4) symmetry group, and are also related to its separability in parabolic coordinates. Here's a paper that talks about it.
 
Also see the reference given in this earlier thread, post #2, courtesy of dextercioby.

The book itself is available online http://www.scribd.com/doc/22703322/Fitts-D-D-Principles-of-Quantum-Mechanics-As-Applied-to-Chemistry-and-Chemical-Physics.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top