Creation and annihilation operators

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
In one dimensional problems in QM only in case of the potential ##V(x)=\frac{m\omega^2x^2}{2}## creation and annihilation operator is defined. Why? Why we couldn't define same similar operators in cases of other potentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
In one dimensional problems in QM only in case of the potential ##V(x)=\frac{m\omega^2x^2}{2}## creation and annihilation operator is defined. Why? Why we couldn't define same similar operators in cases of other potentials?

I guess mathematics wouldn't work and you would not be able to reduce those operators into entities with commutation operators leading to simple algebraic relations. Plus this harmonic potential corresponds to free fields, and this "freeness" i guess is the physical reason why things are simple and tractable and meaningful.
 
Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem. Also the n-dimensional harmonic oscillator. In principle such operators always exist, but only in a few problems are they simple enough to write down in useful form.
 
Bill_K said:
Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem. Also the n-dimensional harmonic oscillator. In principle such operators always exist, but only in a few problems are they simple enough to write down in useful form.


I suppose that. That they always could be written. But why we that speak about phonons only in that problem. Why we don't give a name of excited states in some other problem.

Stepping operators can also be used to solve the Coulomb problem.
Do you have reference for this?
 
The stepping operators for the H atom form the generators of an SO(4) symmetry group, and are also related to its separability in parabolic coordinates. Here's a paper that talks about it.
 
Also see the reference given in this earlier thread, post #2, courtesy of dextercioby.

The book itself is available online http://www.scribd.com/doc/22703322/Fitts-D-D-Principles-of-Quantum-Mechanics-As-Applied-to-Chemistry-and-Chemical-Physics.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top