Solving the Critical Radius for Relativity: Find krE!

  • Thread starter Thread starter n1caboose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Relativity
n1caboose
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Special Relativity states that a clock orbiting Earth will tick slower than one on the surface of Earth. General Relativity states the opposite - a clock will tick faster the further it is from a mass. Is there then a critical radius where these two effects cancel out? Ignore the rotation of Earth for this problem. State the radius in terms of rc=krE, where k is the number to be determined and where rE is the radius of the Earth.

-This was the extra credit problem on my Relativity final which I really wish I could have solved. Anybody want to take a shot at it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


n1caboose said:
Special Relativity states that a clock orbiting Earth will tick slower than one on the surface of Earth. General Relativity states the opposite - a clock will tick faster the further it is from a mass. Is there then a critical radius where these two effects cancel out?

Yes. If you want to take a second stab at it, consider the following:

An object on the surface of the Earth, ignoring the Earth's rotation, will have a "time dilation factor" of

\sqrt{1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r_E}}

An object in orbit about the Earth at some radius r will have a "time dilation factor" of

\sqrt{1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r} - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}

where v is the orbital velocity at radius r. (Can you see how to get this result?) These two facts are enough to get the answer you seek.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top