Cross section in muon pair production from electron positron annihilat

villsen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding the calculation of the cross section in muon pair production from electron positron annihilation.

After some calculations the textbook comes to the conclusion that the differential cross section is approximately equal to:

(1+cos(theta)^2)alpha^2/(4*s)

where alpha is a constant and theta is the angle of the outgoing muons and s is the center of mass energy squared.

The author then proceeds to calculate the total cross section from the differential by integrating over the angular variables theta (from 0 to pi) and phi (from 0 to 2*pi). Since phi is not in the differential cross section it only gives a contribution of 2*pi. left to calculate is the integral over theta. After doing that the result is the total cross section:

4*pi*alpha^2/(3*s)

I just can't seem to get this result and I don't know what I am doing wrong. I want to integrate:

1+cos(theta)^2

giving an indefinite integral:

3*theta/2 + sin(2*theta)/4 + constant

which should give a contribution of 4*pi/3. But from what I can understand this integral should be 8/3. If I try to integrate not on theta but on cos(theta) I get something more like the correct answer but I don't understand why I can't just do the simple integration.

Could someone please make more clear the steps from the differential cross section to the total cross section.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind i figured it out myself. Just forgot the sine in the differential angle:

dΩ=sin(θ)dθdϕ
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top