Cross term gives the autocorrelation?

SamTaylor
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am reading a research paper about "narrow" autocorrelation and
at the beginning there is an expression I don't unterstand

The autocorrelation function is defined as the product
g(\tau) = \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) \cdot f(t-\tau) dt
It is convenient to calculate this as <|f(t) + f(t-\tau)|^2>,
where the cross term gives the autocorrelation.

http://www.wellesley.edu/Physics/brown/pubs/acv85_P1595-P1601.pdf"

Does someone know what is meant with the word cross term?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you expand (a+b)2, it becomes a2 +2ab +b2.

The term 2ab is the cross term. What you want is gotten by expanding the integrand to get 3 integrals and using the middle one, omitting the 2.
 
Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top