Cube Matrices

  • Thread starter Vorde
  • Start date
  • #1
778
0
I just had my last Linear Algebra class, and I didn't get a chance to ask the one question that has been bugging me ever since we started in earnest with matrices.

Why aren't there cube matrices? I mean, mathematical entities where numbers are 'laid out' in 3d not in 2d (not quite mathematically rigorous, but you get the idea). Obviously one could do this with successive matrices, but I wonder if more is to be gained by studying this object as a whole.

Is this a thing? Is there an obvious reason I'm missing as to why there is nothing to gain by doing this?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
pbuk
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,451
1,191
There are, and they certainly are useful; physics wouldn't have got much beyond Newton without them. Google "tensors".
 
  • #3
778
0
Huh, you know I've known about tensors for a while but in a purely pop-science way (the only actual tensors I've been exposed to were in a five-minute digression by my teacher briefly explaining them), I hadn't ever been told to think of them that way!
 
  • #4
pbuk
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,451
1,191
That's a shame, although you have actually been exposed to tensors for some time. Ordinary numbers (scalars), vectors and matrices are just special cases of tensors with 0, 1 and 2 dimensions respectively.
 

Related Threads on Cube Matrices

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top