Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Cube Matrices

  1. May 7, 2013 #1
    I just had my last Linear Algebra class, and I didn't get a chance to ask the one question that has been bugging me ever since we started in earnest with matrices.

    Why aren't there cube matrices? I mean, mathematical entities where numbers are 'laid out' in 3d not in 2d (not quite mathematically rigorous, but you get the idea). Obviously one could do this with successive matrices, but I wonder if more is to be gained by studying this object as a whole.

    Is this a thing? Is there an obvious reason I'm missing as to why there is nothing to gain by doing this?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 7, 2013 #2
    There are, and they certainly are useful; physics wouldn't have got much beyond Newton without them. Google "tensors".
     
  4. May 7, 2013 #3
    Huh, you know I've known about tensors for a while but in a purely pop-science way (the only actual tensors I've been exposed to were in a five-minute digression by my teacher briefly explaining them), I hadn't ever been told to think of them that way!
     
  5. May 7, 2013 #4
    That's a shame, although you have actually been exposed to tensors for some time. Ordinary numbers (scalars), vectors and matrices are just special cases of tensors with 0, 1 and 2 dimensions respectively.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Cube Matrices
  1. Square Cubes (Replies: 7)

  2. Cube fitting (Replies: 0)

  3. Rotatations in a cube? (Replies: 16)

  4. Matrices (Replies: 2)

Loading...