Cubic Polynomials: Solving w/o Rational Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack Diamond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Polynomials
AI Thread Summary
Cubic polynomials can have no rational roots, resulting in three complex or imaginary roots, which can be confusing due to the nature of complex conjugates. The discussion highlights that rational and irrational numbers are both real, meaning a cubic polynomial can have real roots that are not rational. An example provided illustrates a cubic polynomial with complex roots, emphasizing that not all roots need to be rational for a polynomial with rational coefficients. The confusion stems from the distinction between rational and real numbers, as well as the implications of the rational root theorem. Understanding these concepts clarifies how cubic polynomials can exist with entirely non-rational roots.
Jack Diamond
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I think I saw another thread answer this question, but I was a little lost whilst reading it.
I have just recently learned of the rational root theorem and was using it quite happily; figuring out what possibly answers went with cubic and quartic polynomials gave new meaning to guess and check.
But then I realized something strange, I am aware that, because of conjugates, complex and imaginary solutions to polynomials come in pairs. I am also aware that the amount of roots in a polynomial stem from its degree. This became confusing to me when I came across an equation that was not solved using one of the roots found with the rational root theorem.
I am confused on how it is possible for a cubic polynomial to have no rational roots, and thus, three imaginary or complex roots - even though complex and imaginary numbers must come in pairs.
I asked my teacher, but he did not know.


Homework Equations



This was the equation that spurred the whole confusion:
2x^{3}-5x^{2}-9x+13=0

this is a different one my teacher showed the class after I asked him about it:
2x^{3}-9x^{2}-11x+8=0


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was as simple as a multiplicity. But that wouldn't work. I am really at a lost here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing rational with real. Rational and irrational numbers are both real numbers. So you can have a cubic such as (x-√2)(x-√3)(x-√5)=0, the roots are not rational but all are real.
 
rock.freak667 said:
You are confusing rational with real. Rational and irrational numbers are both real numbers. So you can have a cubic such as (x-√2)(x-√3)(x-√5)=0, the roots are not rational but all are real.

Right. But that also doesn't lead to a polynomial with rational coefficients. How about (x-(-1/2+i*sqrt(3)/2))*(x-(-1/2-i*sqrt(3)/2))*(x-1)=x^3-1? If you want an even more complicated example with three real roots try https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=368349
 
Ooops. Forget my first example. That does have a rational root. Sorry. If you change it to x^3-2 and scale them all by 2^(1/3), then it should be ok.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top