I Does Current Density Decay to Zero at Vortex Centers in 2D Systems?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Decay
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of the current density vector, ##\vec J##, in a 2D physical problem, which is non-zero everywhere except at specific points. It is suggested that ##\vec J## decays to zero as it approaches the centers of vortices, where the current density is assumed to vanish. The implications for the magnetic field are also considered, with the assumption that it similarly decays to zero at the vortices due to the absence of current. The conversation seeks further clarification on the expressions and visual representations related to these phenomena. Overall, the relationship between current density and magnetic field behavior in the context of vortices is a central focus.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,929
Reaction score
272
Hello, I have derived an expression for ##\vec J## in a particular, unusual physical problem in 2D. The expression is different from ##\vec 0## everwhere in the material except at at least two different points.

Can I conclude that the only way for this to occur is that ##\vec J## itself decays to ##\vec 0## the closer it gets to the center of the vortices? I assume that the current density vanishes exactly at the center of vortices of currents.

Also, what can I conclude about the magnetic field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you be able to share the expression or perhaps have an image?

I would assume that the magnetic field decays to zero since at those vortices the current goes to zero.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top