Current and Electricity Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective resistance in a circuit involving resistors in series and parallel. It clarifies that two 3Ω resistors in series yield a total of 6Ω for arm ADE, which is then in parallel with another 6Ω resistor, resulting in an equivalent resistance of 3Ω. The importance of simplifying one branch at a time is emphasized to avoid confusion. Additionally, it critiques the terminology used in a textbook regarding effective resistance, stressing that it should reflect the total resistance between points A and E after all simplifications. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the clarification provided.
draotic
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

i got it until ' R P(1) = 3 ohm '
but shouldn't the effective resistance of arm ADE be 6+3=9
and effect. resistance b/w A & E be (9*6) / 9+6 = 54/15 ?
 

Attachments

  • CameraZOOM-20120407125726.jpg
    CameraZOOM-20120407125726.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is it you say ADE, 6+3 not 3+3?

Going from A->D->E, A->D, 2 parallel resistors. D->E only one resistor.
 
please help me to understand how to calculate resistances in arms like the above e.g. .
 
You have to simplify one branch at a time where resistors are clearly either in series or parallel. Starting at the left branch, it begins to simplify like so:
Req2.png


[1] Recognize that the two 3Ω resistors are in series, add them: 3Ω + 3Ω = 6Ω. Replace that resistor in next step.

[2] With the new 6Ω resistor in place we now recognize that it is in parallel with the AD 6Ω resistor, so we do the math to simplify them: 6Ω || 6Ω = 3Ω

[3] The 3Ω resistor replaced the previous parallel ones.

With these simplifications we see that the "arm ADE" is actually the equivalent of two 3Ω resistors in series, thus 6Ω.

Also, I don't like how your book uses phrases like "Therefore Effective Resistance between A and E is given by." This is confusing, as it is only one path between points A and E, NOT the equivalent resistance. The true effective resistance between A and E would be when all resistors in the diagram are simplified down to one resistance (with respect to A and E, e.g. when all that remains is one resistor in between point A and point E).

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Kavik said:
You have to simplify one branch at a time where resistors are clearly either in series or parallel. Starting at the left branch, it begins to simplify like so:
Req2.png


[1] Recognize that the two 3Ω resistors are in series, add them: 3Ω + 3Ω = 6Ω. Replace that resistor in next step.

[2] With the new 6Ω resistor in place we now recognize that it is in parallel with the AD 6Ω resistor, so we do the math to simplify them: 6Ω || 6Ω = 3Ω

[3] The 3Ω resistor replaced the previous parallel ones.

With these simplifications we see that the "arm ADE" is actually the equivalent of two 3Ω resistors in series, thus 6Ω.

Also, I don't like how your book uses phrases like "Therefore Effective Resistance between A and E is given by." This is confusing, as it is only one path between points A and E, NOT the equivalent resistance. The true effective resistance between A and E would be when all resistors in the diagram are simplified down to one resistance (with respect to A and E, e.g. when all that remains is one resistor in between point A and point E).

Hope that helps.
ok , i think i got it
thank you very much sir...
appreciate what you are doing !
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top