Current Divider Formula if R for element = 0

AI Thread Summary
In a current divider circuit, if one resistor (R1) has zero resistance, it effectively becomes a wire, creating a short circuit that can lead to a blown fuse or other damage. The current divider formula, I_i = Is (R_T / R_i), becomes undefined when R1 equals zero, suggesting all current would flow through R2 instead. However, in practical scenarios, real wires have a very small but non-zero resistance, which alters the current distribution significantly. This means that while the total current may be large, the current through R2 would be nearly zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering real-world resistance in circuit analysis.
cavalieregi
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi I was wondering say for example you had this simple current divider circuit.
Wk6BPjV.png

I was wondering if R1 for example had zero resistance it would have all current dropped over it. However pertaining to the current divider formula.

##I_i = Is (R_T / R_i)##

Thus if R1 = zero the equation is not defined but that also means R2 = RT and the equation would claim all current would be dropped over R2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If R1 were zero then it would be a wire not a resistor, so in effect the two terminals of the voltage source would be connected directly to one another forming a short circuit. Try building this circuit and either a fuse will blow or something will break, catch on fire, or explode.

To properly analyze these situations, you have to recognize that zero resistance is an idealization that doesn't exist in the real world. Instead you must use the very small but non-zero resistance that any real wire has. When you do, you will see that the total current is very large while the current across R2 is near zero.
 
  • Like
Likes cavalieregi
Where did you get that formula from? It does not seem to apply here. You should have the sum of the two resistances in the denominator.
 
nasu said:
Where did you get that formula from? It does not seem to apply here. You should have the sum of the two resistances in the denominator.
Yes I just realized sorry. Now It makes sense.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top