Curved to Rectangular Distribution

X_Art_X
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys :)
I have become interested in producing true random numbers of uniform distribution,
and have come across this Numberphile video in my travels:


The narration hints at the topic of converting numeric sequences of a curved distribution,
inherently more likely to be closer to a mean peak, than the outer edges of the curve,
to a rectangular (uniform) distribution of random numbers
(which occurs to me more useful if you were selecting lottery numbers or something like that.
The narrator avoids the topic of the math to do the job, presumably too difficult or too boring for the video.

Would anyone lead me to something to study on that topic?
Considering I’m a hobbyist with senior high school level education, the simpler the better.
I presume this is an intermediate question as I am still familiar with high school math.
Thanks, Art.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would recommend picking up a book on modeling and simulation. These books normally cover the different transformations between distributions so that you can simulate a variety of distributions from uniform random number generators.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top