Cyclotron Resonance (Solid State Physics)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 8K views
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38

Homework Statement



Cyclotron resonance for a spheroidal energy surface. Consider the energy surface

[tex]\epsilon(\mathbf{k}) = \hbar^2 \left( \frac{k_x^2 + k_y^2}{2m_t} + \frac{k_z^2}{2m_l} \right)[/tex]​

where mt is the transverse mass parameter and ml is the longitudinal mass parameter. A surface on which [itex]\epsilon(\mathbf{k})[/itex] is constant will be a spheroid. Use the equation of motion with [itex]\mathbf{v} = \hbar^{-1} \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} \epsilon[/itex] to show that [itex]\omega_c = eB/(m_l m_t)^{1/2}c[/itex] when the static magnetic field B lies in the xy plane.

Homework Equations



Dynamics of Bloch Electrons

The equation of motion for an electron subject to the periodic potential of a crystal lattice is

[tex]\hbar \frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -\frac{e}{c}\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} \ \ \ \textrm{cgs}[/tex][tex]\hbar \frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -e\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} \ \ \ \textrm{SI}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\mathbf{v} = \hbar^{-1} \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} \epsilon(\mathbf{k}) = \hbar^{-1} \left( \hat{k}_x \frac{\partial}{\partial k_x} + \hat{k}_y \frac{\partial}{\partial k_y} + \hat{k}_z \frac{\partial}{\partial k_z} \right) \hbar^2 \left( \frac{k_x^2 + k_y^2}{2m_t} + \frac{k_z^2}{2m_l} \right)[/tex]​

[tex]= \hbar \left( \hat{k}_x \frac{k_x}{m_t} + \hat{k}_y \frac{k_y}{m_t} + \hat{k}_z \frac{k_z}{m_l} \right)[/tex]​

Apply the equation of motion with

[tex]\mathbf{B} = B_x \hat{x} + B_y \hat{y}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -\frac{e}{c}\left( \hat{k}_x \frac{k_x}{m_t} + \hat{k}_y \frac{k_y}{m_t} + \hat{k}_z \frac{k_z}{m_l} \right) \times (B_x \hat{x} + B_y \hat{y})[/tex]

Right so, um how am I supposed to proceed to compute such a cross product? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
so, you have problem with mixing coordinate space vectors with momentum space vectors. you can still do this as long as you know what is
[tex]\hat k_i \times \hat x_j[/tex]
at the moment I can't recall what this is... but i think [tex]\hat k_i \perp \hat x_i[/tex]
should try the momentum space representation of the position operator as a guide to convert them, perhaps?
 
Did you ever figure this out?
 
Last edited:
I just had this on a test, but didn't get it done so as you can imagine i was curious about it. Also, just realized you put this on here a year ago so nevermind.