Damped linear oscillator: Energy losses

Rulonegger
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello everyone. I need to demonstrate that with a damped free oscillator, which is linear, the total energy is a function of the time, and that the time derivative of the total energy is negative, without saying if the motion is underdamped, critically damped or overdamped, i.e. in general.

Homework Equations


From the non-canonical equation for the free oscillator in one dimension m\ddot{x}+b\dot{x}+k{x}=0 where m is the mass attached to the spring (for example), b is a constant for the damping, and k is the spring constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


I could get the general solution for the equation stated above, but the expressions for the energy are a little cumbersome.
Another way I've been tried is that the equation for the motion of the oscillator times \dot{x} gives
m\dot{x}\ddot{x}+b(\dot{x})^2+k{x}\dot{x}=0
integrating over time gives
\frac{m\ddot{x}^2}{2}+b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}+\frac{k x^2}{2}=C
but the former expression looks like the total energy of the simple harmonic oscillator, which is
\frac{m\ddot{x}^2}{2}+\frac{k x^2}{2}=E
so I'm tempted to say that the total energy for the damped oscillator is
E=C-b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}
and say that if the velocity \dot{x} is not zero (b>0 as hypothesis), the expression for E depends explicitly on time, and that the time derivative of E is (using the fundamental theorem for integral calculus):
\frac{dE}{dt}=-b\dot{x}^2
which is negative, so energy decreases as time increases.
So far, i think everything is correct, but i need to formalize the above steps, first on the fact that E=C-b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}, which was the crucial point of the proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything looks fine to me (except I'm sure you meant to write the kinetic energy as ##\frac{m\dot{x}^2}{2}##).

Note that your result for dE/dt makes a lot of sense. The damping force is ##f = -b\dot{x}## and the rate at which that force does work is ##f\dot{x} = -b\dot{x}^2##.
 
Thank's TSny, and yeah I've made a copy-paste error. I'm very grateful for your help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top