Damper Selection for High Power Rifle Shooting Rest | 3502 ft-lbs of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter livinskey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damper
AI Thread Summary
A user is designing a shooting rest for a high power rifle and seeks a damper to absorb recoil energy effectively. They calculated that a 100lb damper with a 7-inch stroke absorbs only 1.6% of the 3502 ft-lbs muzzle energy, while a 250lb damper with a longer stroke absorbs 10%, leading to confusion about their calculations. Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the muzzle energy in relation to the rifle's mass, suggesting that the energy perceived as recoil may be less than calculated. The user is also seeking guidance on the appropriate damper size and formulas for combining multiple dampers or springs. Accurate calculations and understanding of recoil dynamics are essential for effective damper selection.
livinskey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ,

I am making a shooting rest for my high power rifle and I would like to have a damper take most of the recoil energy so that the shooting rest doesn't move back or up when shooting.

I attempted to calculate what damper would be appropriate for this but I am getting results that don't seem realistic. For example, according to my calculations, a damper that is rated 100lbs and has a stroke of 7inches would only absorb 1.6% of the muzzle energy. A damper that is rated 250lbs and has a stroke of 17 11/16 inches absorbs 10% of the muzzle energy? I must be doing something wrong...

Here are some numbers:
Muzzle energy (of the projectile) 3502 ft-lbs.
Rifle mass: 8 lbs.

Questions?
What size damper should I use?
How much of the muzzle energy actually goes into felt recoil?
What is the formula for multiple dampers and springs connected in searies or parallel?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your muzzle energy will be 3500 ft lbs when calculating the kick of the rifle. A bullet weighs very little and will be accelerated to a very high speed, while your rifles weighs many many times that at 8 lbs. I don't know, but perhaps it is 3500 divided by the weight of the rifle??
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top