Damping effect of swinging pendulum affect period?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of damping on a magnetic pendulum's oscillation period. It highlights that the presence of a conductor generates Foucault currents, which slow the pendulum's swing and reduce its amplitude. The key question raised is whether this damping also affects the oscillation period, with a suggestion that increased damping typically leads to a decrease in frequency and an increase in period. The conversation explores the relationship between amplitude decay and speed reduction, questioning if they are proportional. Overall, the impact of damping on both amplitude and period is a critical focus of the discussion.
Learnphysics
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Lets say i have a magnetic pendulm, (basically a barmagnet suspended from a with a string tabletop) and a conductor at the bottom.

The conductor will ofcourse have Foucault currents generated in it, and this due to conservation of energy, will slow down the swinging of the pendulum, reducing the "amplitude" of its swing.

But my question is, will it also reduce the period it takes for the pendulum to oscillate?
Is the rate at which the amplitude decays, proportional to the decrease in speed so as to preserve the time taken?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me answer this by asking another question.......When the conductor is present does the pendulum still move with S.H.M.?
 
Damping of a pendulum causes a (small) decrease in its frequency and thus the period increases. How much has to do with how much damping you apply.

What do you mean exactly when you say "Is the rate at which the amplitude decays, proportional to the decrease in speed so as to preserve the time taken?"
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top