Damping ratio from a transfer function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the damping ratio (zeta) from a given transfer function, specifically one that includes a non-zero coefficient for "s" in the numerator. Participants clarify that the standard relationship 25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega is still applicable, despite the transfer function not fitting neatly into typical second-order system forms. The focus shifts to understanding that the natural frequency (omega) and damping factor (zeta) are derived from the pole locations rather than the zeros of the transfer function. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes that the original equation for damping remains valid, and the poles are crucial for determining the system's characteristics. The insights shared enhance the understanding of how to approach such transfer functions in control systems.
sgsawant
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a transfer function for system.

23.23*s + 1.421
------------------------------------- = tf
s^2 + 25.88*s + 1.421Since the numerator has a non-zero coefficient for "s" I am wary about equating

25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega [the stuff we usually do for calculating the damping ratio].Can someone shed any light on this?

Regards,

-sgsawant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a refresher. Can someone answer the above question?
 
Hello sgsawant,

It's been awhile since I've looked at stuff like this. But it appears that your system is some sort of lowpass + bandpass combination.

I believe your "25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega" is still valid though.

Have you considered the fact that

\frac{23.23s + 1.421}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421} = \frac{23.23s}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421} \ + \ \frac{1.421}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421}
 
Thanks for your reply. But the cases where 2 * zeta * omega is valid - for those that I have seen - have omega squared in the numerator and also as the constant in the quadratic of s in the denominator. Thus omega can be usually simply calculated (either by taking the root of the numerator or that of the constant term in the denominator).

What method would you advice in this case to calculate omega - and then eventually zeta?

Regards,

-sgsawant
 
sgsawant said:
Thanks for your reply. But the cases where 2 * zeta * omega is valid - for those that I have seen - have omega squared in the numerator and also as the constant in the quadratic of s in the denominator. Thus omega can be usually simply calculated (either by taking the root of the numerator or that of the constant term in the denominator).

Yes, that's the case for a second order lowpass system (or a second order lowpass section of a more complex system).

The transfer function of a second order lowpass system H(s) takes the form

H_{LP}(s) = A_0 \frac{\omega_0^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}

Note that at low frequencies (frequencies can be seen by replacing s with ), H() approaches A0. But at high frequencies, H() approaches 0; meaning only the low frequencies get through.

But there are other types of second order systems. A second order highpass system takes the form

H_{HP}(s) = A_0 \frac{s^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

Here, only the high frequencies make it through.

Similarly for a bandpass we have:

H_{BP}(s) = A_0 \frac{2 \zeta \omega_0 s}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

And bandstop,

H_{BS}(s) = A_0 \frac{s^2 + \omega_0^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

Note that the denominator is the same in all types.

What method would you advice in this case to calculate omega - and then eventually zeta?

The numerator (i.e. zeros) of your transfer function doesn't seem to quite fit with any of the standard second order systems. But if I remember correctly, both the the resonant (natural) frequency and the damping factor are functions of the pole locations, not the zeros.
 
Last edited:
Thanks mate! That was quite informative. The poles argument really made it clear.
 
That is the damping offered by the base movement.. you do not have to worry about that.. 2*zeta*omega holds good
 
Back
Top