Damping ratio from a transfer function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the damping ratio from a given transfer function, specifically focusing on the implications of having a non-zero coefficient for "s" in the numerator. Participants are exploring the relationship between the damping ratio and the parameters of the transfer function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the standard formula for damping ratio in the context of the provided transfer function. There are discussions about the characteristics of different types of second-order systems and how they relate to the given function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the transfer function and its classification, while others are seeking clarification on how to extract the damping ratio and natural frequency from the given parameters. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the numerator's structure on the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of standard forms for second-order systems and the importance of pole locations in determining the damping factor and resonant frequency. Participants are also considering the constraints imposed by the specific form of the transfer function.

sgsawant
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a transfer function for system.

23.23*s + 1.421
------------------------------------- = tf
s^2 + 25.88*s + 1.421Since the numerator has a non-zero coefficient for "s" I am wary about equating

25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega [the stuff we usually do for calculating the damping ratio].Can someone shed any light on this?

Regards,

-sgsawant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a refresher. Can someone answer the above question?
 
Hello sgsawant,

It's been awhile since I've looked at stuff like this. But it appears that your system is some sort of lowpass + bandpass combination.

I believe your "25.88 = 2 * zeta * omega" is still valid though.

Have you considered the fact that

\frac{23.23s + 1.421}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421} = \frac{23.23s}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421} \ + \ \frac{1.421}{s^2 + 25.88s + 1.421}
 
Thanks for your reply. But the cases where 2 * zeta * omega is valid - for those that I have seen - have omega squared in the numerator and also as the constant in the quadratic of s in the denominator. Thus omega can be usually simply calculated (either by taking the root of the numerator or that of the constant term in the denominator).

What method would you advice in this case to calculate omega - and then eventually zeta?

Regards,

-sgsawant
 
sgsawant said:
Thanks for your reply. But the cases where 2 * zeta * omega is valid - for those that I have seen - have omega squared in the numerator and also as the constant in the quadratic of s in the denominator. Thus omega can be usually simply calculated (either by taking the root of the numerator or that of the constant term in the denominator).

Yes, that's the case for a second order lowpass system (or a second order lowpass section of a more complex system).

The transfer function of a second order lowpass system H(s) takes the form

H_{LP}(s) = A_0 \frac{\omega_0^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}

Note that at low frequencies (frequencies can be seen by replacing s with ), H() approaches A0. But at high frequencies, H() approaches 0; meaning only the low frequencies get through.

But there are other types of second order systems. A second order highpass system takes the form

H_{HP}(s) = A_0 \frac{s^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

Here, only the high frequencies make it through.

Similarly for a bandpass we have:

H_{BP}(s) = A_0 \frac{2 \zeta \omega_0 s}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

And bandstop,

H_{BS}(s) = A_0 \frac{s^2 + \omega_0^2}{s^2 + 2 \zeta \omega_0 s + \omega_0^2}.

Note that the denominator is the same in all types.

What method would you advice in this case to calculate omega - and then eventually zeta?

The numerator (i.e. zeros) of your transfer function doesn't seem to quite fit with any of the standard second order systems. But if I remember correctly, both the the resonant (natural) frequency and the damping factor are functions of the pole locations, not the zeros.
 
Last edited:
Thanks mate! That was quite informative. The poles argument really made it clear.
 
That is the damping offered by the base movement.. you do not have to worry about that.. 2*zeta*omega holds good
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
64K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K