Dark Energy: Negative Pressure or Density?

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
<<Mentor note: Edited for readability.>>
<<Follow-up: futher edited to fix LaTeX tags>>

Context: FRW Metric /universe, perfect comological fluid , dark/vacuum energy

So the equation of state ## w \rho=p, w=-1, \rho=-p##
so this clealy implies either ##p## or ##\rho## is negative.
Am I correct in thinking which it is, depends on the cosmological constant?
So ##cosmo constant >0, \rho>0, p<0##
##cosmo constant <0, \rho <0, p>0?##

Now I look at a Friedmann equation given by: ##\Omega -1 = \frac{k}{H^2a^2} ##, where ## \Omega = \frac{\rho}{\rho_{c}} ##, ##H=\frac{\dot{a^{2}}}{a^{2}} ##

and solving for ##a## as a function of ##t## for ##cosmo constant >0##, my book says that in this case ##\Omega <0 ## ( which I understand if my above reasoning is correct) and so from the Friedmann equation this is only possible if ##k=-1 ##. So this is fine, I agree , but the denominator needs to be greater than zero.

Anyway, it than solves for ## cosmo constant >0 ##, and says all ## k=-1,0,1 ## are fine. This is my QUESTION. I don't understand how ##k=-1## can be okay for both ##cosmo constant >0, <0 ## which in turn say different things above which of ## \rho ## and ##p## are negative and positive.

Thanks very much for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to fix those Latex tags or else this is pretty unreadable...

I see a note by a mentor saying it's been edited for readability, but this still looks pretty unreadable to me.
 
binbagsss said:
So ##cosmoconstant>0,\rho>0,p<0##

##cosmoconstant <0, \rho<0, p>0##?

Yes.

binbagsss said:
solving for ##a## as a function of ##t## for ##cosmo constant >0##, my book says that in this case ##\Omega<0##

I think you mean for ##cosmo constant < 0##, correct? That's the case for which ##\rho < 0##, which makes ##\Omega < 0##.

binbagsss said:
I don't understand how ##k=-1## can be okay for both ##cosmo constant >0, < 0##

##k## describes the spatial curvature; it doesn't describe either the density or the pressure associated with the cosmological constant. All this is saying is that "open" spatial slices (i.e., negative spatial curvature) are compatible with both a positive and negative cosmological constant.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top