Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dark energy - Padmanabhan

  1. Mar 7, 2006 #1

    Kea

    User Avatar

    Dark energy: Mystery of the Millenium
    T. Padmanabhan
    http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603114

    This is an impressive paper, based on a talk and quite readable. :smile:
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 8, 2006 #2

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    Indeed, Kea. I read that one yesterday. Padmanabhan has a way with words.
     
  4. Mar 8, 2006 #3

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    I just finished reading it. What a lot of good solid MEAT in that paper. Obviously based on decades of deep thought by himself and semingly everybody else, it really does give us a general NECESSARY framework for evaluating quantum gravity programs.
     
  5. Mar 8, 2006 #4

    Kea

    User Avatar

    Yes, I thought so too. I must put some time aside to go through some of his papers. :smile:
     
  6. Mar 8, 2006 #5

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member


    He's got his references nicely organized by topic, I noticed. I liked the way he synthesized holography, thermodynamics, and special viewpoints to get his "model that works". Very convincing.

    I was especially diverted by his choice of variables for the action: the metric, the Christoffel symbols, and the curvature tensor. Noting also that the curvature tensor, in this representstion, depends on the Christoffel symbols but not the metric. I wonder how many decades of pondering the common wisdom of GR it took to come up with that!
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2006
  7. Mar 9, 2006 #6

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    What I really like is his ability reach a broad audience. Modern theorists tend to target a very narrow audience possessing great expertise in the subject material. This is not necessarily a bad thing. It's an efficient way to publish new research. Unfortunately, it leaves most of the rest of us slack-jawed. Here are some of his other papers I like:

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602280
    Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602117
    Advanced Topics in Cosmology: A Pedagogical Introduction

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510492 :
    Darker Side of the Universe

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0510015
    A new perspective on Gravity and the dynamics of Spacetime

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503107
    Understanding Our Universe: Current Status and Open Issues
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Dark energy - Padmanabhan
  1. Dark energy (Replies: 18)

  2. Dark Energy (Replies: 15)

Loading...