Dark Matter Halo: Modeling Rotational Effect on Galaxy V(r)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the rotational effects of dark matter halos on galaxies, specifically addressing the Milky Way's dark matter dominance. Participants explore the implications of the Navarro-Frenk-White profile, noting that while the mass density function diverges at zero radius, the integral of the density remains finite. The conversation highlights that dark matter constitutes a significant portion of the Milky Way's mass, with estimates suggesting it is over five times more massive than baryonic matter when considering the entire galaxy. However, within the inner regions, baryonic matter is dominant, particularly within a few kiloparsecs. Overall, the complexity of dark matter's role in galaxy dynamics is emphasized, particularly in relation to angular momentum exchange.
Creebe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm a third year engineering physics student, and my team and I are trying to model how the rotation (V(r)) of a galaxy is affected by the possible existence of the dark matter halo. Here are my questions:

Regarding the dark matter halo:

The integral of the mass density function is divergent at 0, how do we deal with it? How does it make any physical sense.
Here's the formula:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navarro-Frenk-White_profile

Is the Milky Way Galaxy dark matter-dominant?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Creebe said:
The integral of the mass density function is divergent at 0, how do we deal with it? How does it make any physical sense.
While the density diverges at 0 radius, the integral of the density (which gives the mass within a given radius) does not (it goes to zero as one might expect).
Creebe said:
Is the Milky Way Galaxy dark matter-dominant?
The wikipedia page you listed links to a http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/573/2/597/pdf/0004-637X_573_2_597.pdf" that indicates (pg. 604, tables 1 and 2) that the ratio of the mass of dark matter to the mass of the disk and bulge of the galaxy within 3 kpc of the center is 0.95 according to the "favored" model without exchange of angular momentum (between normal matter and dark matter) and 0.24 according to the "favored" model with angular momentum exchange. So, while a significant percentage of the matter within that radius is dark matter, normal matter constitutes the majority of the matter (especially in the latter model, which I would think would be more realistic).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Creebe said:
Is the Milky Way Galaxy dark matter-dominant?
Overall: yes. If you look at the entire milky-way galaxy, DM has >5 times as much mass. Baryonic matter, however, is dominant within about the half-light radius (something like 100 kpc)
 
Allthough I agree that in the inner parts the Milky Way is baryon dominated. Nevertheless, the half light radius of the Milky Way is not even close to 100 kpc (that is almost the virial radius of ots host dark matter halo), but rather of the order of a few kpc.
 
harcel said:
Allthough I agree that in the inner parts the Milky Way is baryon dominated. Nevertheless, the half light radius of the Milky Way is not even close to 100 kpc (that is almost the virial radius of ots host dark matter halo), but rather of the order of a few kpc.
Sorry, yes---more like a few kpc---for sure!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top