Dark Matter & Its Effects on Regular Matter

AI Thread Summary
Dark matter is theorized to exist throughout the universe, yet its effects on regular matter, including our bodies and the solar system, are minimal due to its sparse distribution. Calculations suggest that the total mass of dark matter within the solar system is approximately 10^19 kg, which is too small to create significant gravitational effects. The gravitational influence of dark matter is diluted because it is spread over a vast volume, making it difficult to detect. Additionally, while dark matter contributes to the dynamics of galaxies, the solar system's density is much higher compared to the surrounding galaxy, resulting in different gravitational behaviors. Consequently, the velocities of planets in our solar system decrease with distance from the Sun, aligning with the expected gravitational effects of visible matter rather than dark matter.
MNyberg1020
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If dark matter really does exist everywhere, and is constantly passing through our bodies, why doesn't this extremely dense matter affect regular matter? How are the atoms of our body not pulled by dark matter's gradational field? Also, if dark matter is thought to exist because stars in galaxies are moving too fast to be held in orbit by regular matter alone, why doesn't our solar system demonstrate those same properties if dark matter is everywhere? Why do the velocities of our planets drop the farther they are from the sun? Shouldn't our planets be affected by dark matter too?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
MNyberg1020 said:
why doesn't our solar system demonstrate those same properties if dark matter is everywhere? Why do the velocities of our planets drop the farther they are from the sun? Shouldn't our planets be affected by dark matter too?

I've done the crude analysis in the past somewhere on this forum, but I don't feel like digging up the post... The point is, if you do the calculation, you find out that the total mass of dark matter within our solar system should be ~10^19kg, roughly uniformly distributed between the sun and the outer edges of the Kuiper belt. Now, 10^19kg is around the mass of a medium sized object in the asteroid belt. So, to begin with, the gravitational perturbation from such an object is tiny, but then considering that it is smeared out over dozens of AU makes the effect much more difficult to detect.
 
MNyberg1020 said:
If dark matter really does exist everywhere, and is constantly passing through our bodies, why doesn't this extremely dense matter affect regular matter? How are the atoms of our body not pulled by dark matter's gradational field? Also, if dark matter is thought to exist because stars in galaxies are moving too fast to be held in orbit by regular matter alone, why doesn't our solar system demonstrate those same properties if dark matter is everywhere? Why do the velocities of our planets drop the farther they are from the sun? Shouldn't our planets be affected by dark matter too?

If you were to take the mass of the Sun, planets, etc of the solar system and divide it into the volume of the solar system, the average density you got would be much much greater than if you were to take the mass of all the star systems in a large local section of the galaxy and divide it into the volume of that section. In other words, the Solar system is a dense pocket compared to the local region of the galaxy.

Now consider that the vast majority of visible mass of the galaxy is constrained to a disk and dark matter is spread out in a spherical volume enclosing that disk. So even though there is ~5 times as much dark matter than visible matter in the galaxy, it is not dense, but rather spread out over a much larger volume and very thinly. So as Nabeshin has already said, you would expect to find very little dark matter within the Solar system.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top