Dashpots and the Work - Kinetic Energy Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on incorporating a dashpot into a work-kinetic energy analysis for a box being dragged up a ramp. The equation KA + WNET = KB is used to analyze the work done by various forces, including gravity, tension, spring force, and friction. The work done by the dashpot is expressed as ∫bv^2dt, raising questions about its integrability given limited displacement and velocity boundary conditions. The conversation suggests that deriving the general equation of motion may be necessary to understand the velocity as a function of time. Ultimately, the integration of the dashpot's work is contingent on understanding system variables, emphasizing the complexity of the analysis.
Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I need to accommodate a dashpot in an intentionally simple work-kinetic energy analysis method. For example, for a box being dragged up a ramp via a rope while attached to a spring, I can deal with the work done by gravity, rope tension, spring force, and friction via the following method, along with enough known constants and sufficient displacement and velocity boundary conditions?

Homework Equations


KA+WNET=KB
... where A is the position of the box at the bottom of the ramp, and B is the position of the box at the top of the ramp.

The Attempt at a Solution


For gravity, friction, spring, and tension this becomes...
KA + ∫(mg)ds + ∫Tds + ∫(ks)ds + ∫μkFNds = KB

The work terms for the dashpot are:
∫bvds = ∫b(ds/dt)ds = ∫b(ds/dt)(ds/dt)dt = ∫bv2dt

Are any of these terms integrate-able if I'm limited to, again, only knowing displacement and/or velocity boundary conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taulant Sholla said:
Are any of these terms integrate-able if I'm limited to, again, only knowing displacement and/or velocity boundary conditions?
The only way I can see is if you can write out and solve the general equation of motion. Observations of the boundary conditions should then allow you to deduce the velocity as a functionof time. That's not entirely satisfactory because it depends on theory, not pure observation.
 
Taulant Sholla said:
∫bvds = ∫b(ds/dt)ds = ∫b(ds/dt)(ds/dt)dt = ∫bv2dt
If your question is whether the work done on the dashpot is a function of some system variable, e.g. v, what does your first integral above tell you?
(Related: why is it a dumb idea to drive your car fast instead of slowly over a given distance in order to save gas?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top