DC Networks and Kirchoff's Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter rikiki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dc Laws Networks
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the current through a 12V battery using Kirchhoff's Laws in a circuit with multiple branches. Participants share their attempts at solving the circuit equations, applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to find the currents I1, I2, and I3. There is confusion regarding the signs of the currents, with some values turning negative, indicating a need to reassess the assumed current directions. The conversation also touches on calculating power dissipated in resistors using different formulas, emphasizing the importance of using the correct voltage across each resistor. Ultimately, participants are encouraged to recheck their calculations and understand the implications of negative current values on direction.
  • #31
biggdogg9 said:
I have follewed up this point quite clearly, however I don't understand the reason why we have to multiply equation 1 by 3 ? If somebody could explain this too me or even send me a link where I can understand why.

It's a technique for solving the two simultaneous equations. The idea is to make the coefficients of one of the variables the same in both equations so that when the difference of the two equations is taken that variable drops away leaving a single equation in one unknown (the other variable).

In this case the poster chose to eliminate the I1 variable. To that end he looked at the coefficients of I1 in each equation: 4 and 3. A number that has both as factors is 12, so he multiplied the two equations by suitable values to yield 12I1 in each.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Cheers gneil
 
  • #33
Hi All,

I too have this question and am a little confused. For the value of L2 I get -0.4545 but if I use this figure to get L1 I get 0.590875 which is nowhere near what you guys are saying.

If I use 0.4545 instead I get somehwere near the answers suggested on here.

Could someone please explain what happens to the minus (is it disregarded because it is indicative of current direction?) or have I done something school boy style?

Thanks
 
  • #34
maths used to get to this point :-

(12L1+9L2)-(12L1+20L2)=3-8

-11L2=-5

L2=-5/11

L2=-0.4545

4L1+3L2=1

4L1+(3*-0.4545)=1

4L1-1.3635=1

4L1=1+1.3635

L1=2.3635/4

L1=0.590875
 
  • #35
waltarno said:
maths used to get to this point :-

(12L1+9L2)-(12L1+20L2)=3-8

-11L2=-5 ← negative on both sides[/color]

L2=-5/11 ← Incorrect sign[/color]

L2=-0.4545

4L1+3L2=1

4L1+(3*-0.4545)=1

4L1-1.3635=1

4L1=1+1.3635

L1=2.3635/4

L1=0.590875
 
  • Like
Likes waltarno
  • #36
Thanks for the quick reply, obviously didn't spot that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K