DCM+Methanol+10% Pd on Carbon generates HCl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Hcl Pd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the unexpected formation of a salt during the deprotection of a phenol and a secondary amine using 10% Pd on carbon in DCM with methanol. The user hypothesizes that the salt could be due to HCl generated from DCM or impurities in methanol, but notes that the amount of acid present seems insufficient to account for the salt formation. They also consider the possibility of carbonic acid being produced from the CBZ deprotection as a contributing factor. The user concludes that it is unlikely to be an HCl salt, as the compound does not exhibit the expected hygroscopic properties. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of reaction conditions and the potential for unexpected byproducts in chemical synthesis.
gravenewworld
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
27
I've been trying to remove a benzyl protecting group of a phenol and also remove a CBZ protecting group on a secondary amine by standard hydrogenation of the material with 10% Pd on Carbon. My protected molecule is very lipophilic and soluble in DCM. The reason I added methanol was because the intermediates generated (the intermediate where the benzyl is removed but the CBZ still present and vice versa) are generally not soluble in DCM, but soluble in methanol. Deprotection of the two groups worked fine, but to my surprise, after working up the reaction, my material is a salt. I definitely know it is a salt because of the broadening of the NMR signals. I'm just not sure where the acid is coming from or even what acid it is.

I know a good way to dehalogenate material is by hydrogenation with Pd on carbon. Am I dehalogenating the DCM ,and with the presence of methanol as well, generating HCl which is reacting with the amine moities to generate a HCl salt?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
So you simultaneously deprotected a phenol and an amine, eh?

Do you see it yet? (you are going to kick yourself)

BTW, I'm sure that you know that common impurities in methanol include formic acid and that DCM in contact with oxygen and light produces HCL and phosgene provided there is no inhibitor, like methanol, in the DCM reagent. These acids are usually present in only trace amounts.
 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
So you simultaneously deprotected a phenol and an amine, eh?

Yup. The phenol's acidity has never given me a problem with similar analogs before.


Do you see it yet? (you are going to kick yourself)


Yup, via NMR, LC/MS, and TLC. 99% pure by HPLC and the mass spec is spot on. You only know that it is a salt because it is obvious in the NMR.

BTW, I'm sure that you know that common impurities in methanol include formic acid and that DCM in contact with oxygen and light produces HCL and phosgene provided there is no inhibitor, like methanol, in the DCM reagent. These acids are usually present in only trace amounts.


I don't think that is the problem because there are 1-2 equivalents of acid that are forming salts with my compound. It would take much more acid than trace amounts to form a salt with my compound. The only other thing that I can think of is that the CO2 that is produced from the CBZ deprotection is forming carbonic acid and the molecule is salting with that.

Now that I think about it, I'm pretty certain that it can't be an HCl salt. Most compounds that have 2 HCl equivalents are incredibly hydroscopic. The salt of my compound doesn't seem to soak up a lot of water from the atmosphere at all if you leave it out.
 
pKa of phenol is 9.6. pKa of the acid form of methyl amine (ammonium) is 10.6. Secondary amines are stronger bases than primary ones.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top