Can a Football Behave Like a Wave at the Same Speed as an Electron?

smatik
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
i've just learned de broglie wave equation in chemistry which tells that matter can act as wave.
if an electron is moving at a certain speed(v) at which its wavelength is comparably in meters. If a football is made to move at the same speed (v),will it behave as a wave? Since Football also has electrons then why don't individual electrons(in football moving with same velocity v) behave as wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bear in mind:
The deBroglie "matter waves" are a stepping-stone concept useful for teaching but the theory is not complete. As you advance in your studies you will encounter more complete ideas.

It is not so much that "matter can behave as a wave" but that the intuitive distinction between matter and waves is in error. It's like the old saw about the blind men and the elephant - what you "see" depends on how you "look". That should hold you for now ;) I don't want to get too far off the material in your course for fear of confusing you further.

To answer your questions - the football always have wavelike properties. To observe them, though, requires very narrow slits. Every part of the football does this.

The wavelength equation is:$$\lambda_{dB}=\frac{h}{\gamma m_0 v}$$... i.e. as the speed increases, the wavelength decreases. Or, classically, $$\lambda_{dB}=\frac{h}{mv}$$... so: at what speed, v, will the wavelength of an electron be on the scale of meters?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top