Dealing w/slight modification of Gaussian integral?

Zacarias Nason
Messages
67
Reaction score
4
Hey, folks. I'm doing a problem wherein I have to evaluate a slight variation of the Gaussian integral for the first time, but I'm not totally sure how to go about it; this is part of an integration by parts problem where the dv is similar to a gaussian integral:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^2e^{-\alpha x^2} dx, \ \text{where} \ \alpha > 0. My question is, how should I deal with the alpha in the exponent? I know the Gaussian integral equals
\sqrt{\pi}

But how do I deal with that alpha?

I thought I found my answer in a handout, but when I applied it, I ended up still being wrong; I attempted to integrate by parts and I got zero, the two terms cancelling each other out; what gives?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Zacarias Nason said:
Hey, folks. I'm doing a problem wherein I have to evaluate a slight variation of the Gaussian integral for the first time, but I'm not totally sure how to go about it; this is part of an integration by parts problem where the dv is similar to a gaussian integral:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x^2e^{-\alpha x^2} dx, \ \text{where} \ \alpha > 0. My question is, how should I deal with the alpha in the exponent? I know the Gaussian integral equals
\sqrt{\pi}

But how do I deal with that alpha?

I thought I found my answer in a handout, but when I applied it, I ended up still being wrong; I attempted to integrate by parts and I got zero, the two terms cancelling each other out; what gives?
Try a substitution to get back to the basic form: ##y=\sqrt{\alpha} x##
Then integration by parts.
 
  • Like
Likes Zacarias Nason
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top