Dealing with Humidity While Stargazing: Is It Worth It?

AI Thread Summary
High humidity can significantly impact stargazing, causing telescopes to fog up and reducing visibility. To mitigate this, it's recommended to allow the scope to acclimate to the outside temperature for at least 30 minutes before use. Observers noted that viewing conditions improved when the scope was pre-warmed in a car, especially on less humid nights. While the moon provided excellent detail, expectations for Mars were not met, leading to discussions about potential issues with scope alignment and eyepiece selection. Proper preparation and understanding of humidity effects are crucial for a successful stargazing experience.
kleinma
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I tried to check out Mars and the moon the other night with my new orion dob.. but it was so humid that the scope got all fogged up... is this just something you have to live with? Are nights of high humidity just bad nights to go observing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
if you take a scope out of a A/Ced house or car into warmer night air it will fog in a hi H envro.
if you let the scope warm up this will not be as big a problem, by leaving it out of the cooler places or turn off the car A/C unless dew actively is falling at the time.
 
My scope manual says to leave it outside with the lens caps on for half an hour to let the temp equalize. Even without condensation, temperature variations will lower the resolution of the scope.

I used to just crack open my window and view from there though.
 
last night i put the scope in the car about 45 min before we went out... it worked much better.. also the humidity wasnt AS bad last night... first thing i pointed at was the moon.. awesome to see it with so much detail... obviously the easiest thing to find in the sky.. Mars we found with ease, but I was a little disappointed because I thought we would get a little more detail with it... it seemed less red through the scope and not all that much bigger than the naked eye... maybe we were doing something wrong.. because i tried using different eyepieces to increase the view.. but still couldn't see it any better
 
Originally posted by kleinma
last night i put the scope in the car about 45 min before we went out... it worked much better.. also the humidity wasnt AS bad last night... first thing i pointed at was the moon.. awesome to see it with so much detail... obviously the easiest thing to find in the sky.. Mars we found with ease, but I was a little disappointed because I thought we would get a little more detail with it... it seemed less red through the scope and not all that much bigger than the naked eye... maybe we were doing something wrong.. because i tried using different eyepieces to increase the view.. but still couldn't see it any better
If that was the case, see if the scope came with detailed collimation (alignment) instructions. That could be THE problem, and changing eyepieces should have definitely made an obvious difference.

What kind of scope, and focal length, and what focal length eyepieces are you using??
 
Originally posted by russ_watters
My scope manual says to leave it outside with the lens caps on for half an hour to let the temp equalize. Even without condensation, temperature variations will lower the resolution of the scope.

This is key. This same time can also be used to allow your eyes to dark-adapt (takes ~15 minutes).
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
30K
Back
Top