Debating the Strength of Base and Concentration: A Critical Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relationship between concentration and the strength of acids and bases, particularly in the context of a classroom debate. A teacher suggested that concentration affects strength based on pOH, while a student argued that strength should be determined by Kb or percentage ionization. The consensus emerged that pKa values are more relevant for understanding acid/base strength than pH or pOH, as they reflect the tendency to dissociate rather than mere concentration. Increasing the concentration of an acid does not inherently increase its strength; it will dissociate in a specific ratio that defines its strength. The conversation also touches on the complexities of measuring acidity and the theoretical aspects of proton affinity versus practical measures like pKa. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that while pOH can indicate acidity, it does not directly measure the intrinsic strength of an acid or base.
icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1
In a test that was held many weeks ago.. We were asked whether concentration will affect the strength. The answer given by the teacher is yes.. As based on the concept of pOH... But i strongly disagree and i had a debate with my lecturer. . I said it should be based on Kb or percentage ionisation . And after much discussion he has mark both answers right.. But i felt tat there should be a definite answer to the question. . Please enlighten me.. Anyone..
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Base "strength" should be based on Kb. In any O. Chem class you take, you'll have to memorize a table of pKa values, not pH or pOH values. The latter are based on concentration instead of tendency to dissociate and aren't as useful. The reason for this is that it let's you predict whether something will be protonated or deprotonated in a reaction since this is often the first step of a reaction.

You can increase the concentration of an acid all you want in a solution but that isn't going to make the acid any stronger. It will still dissociate in a very specific ratio and is ultimately what governs it strength in any meaningful way.

I'm curious what your teacher's reasoning was.
 
pOH is -log[OH-]

The term "[OH-]" is the concentration of OH-... or at least the activity of OH-.
 
Reminds me of a seasoned professor of Quantum Chem that I know, who confided that it took him quite a few years before he figured out why chemists insisted on using pKa as a measure of acid/base strength. Which was understandable; Coming from a physics background, he'd naturally never done a titration in his life. From his physical/theoretical viewpoint, the most natural measure of acidity is proton affinity. That is, the total energy (in vacuum) of the molecule with a proton, minus the total energy of the molecule without a proton.

It's a simple and precise definition but useless to the chemist, since it doesn't directly correspond to anything you can measure. Theoretically, calculating proton affinities is fairly easy, but calculating pKa is actually quite hard. The equillibrium constant is related to deltaG for the dissociation reaction. That deltaG is only weakly related to the proton affinity energy. To begin with, both the molecule and proton are in solution. Second, you have the electrostatic/Nernst potential from the protons already in solution, and the mixing entropy/concentration, and the whole difficulty of figuring out what the entropy of a dissolved proton in water really is. Theoretically it's a rather hairy concept, and a good amount of effort has gone into figuring out ways to calculate pKa.

So that's a bit of trivia for you: deltaG has a certain concentration dependence. Actually it always does, but it's larger for acid/base reactions since concentration changes also change the ionic strength, etc. So Kb itself also has a certain concentration dependence.

As for the question, it depends on what they were asking. pOH, like pH is by definition a concentration, and it's the measure of acidity of a solution. You could call it the 'strength' of the solution's acidity/alkalinity if you like. But it's certainly not a measure of the strength of an acid or base itself, no.

How could it be? In the simplest possible terms: How could you tell from pH alone whether you've got a high concentration of a weak acid or a low concentration of a strong acid? What you would need then, is the concentration of H+ or OH- relative the amount of acid/base: Which is essentially what pKa is!
 
DDTea said:
Base "strength" should be based on Kb. In any O. Chem class you take, you'll have to memorize a table of pKa values, not pH or pOH values. The latter are based on concentration instead of tendency to dissociate and aren't as useful. The reason for this is that it let's you predict whether something will be protonated or deprotonated in a reaction since this is often the first step of a reaction.

You can increase the concentration of an acid all you want in a solution but that isn't going to make the acid any stronger. It will still dissociate in a very specific ratio and is ultimately what governs it strength in any meaningful way.

I'm curious what your teacher's reasoning was.

Thanks
This is good answer!
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top