- #36
Borek
Mentor
- 28,949
- 4,244
BobG said:Running shoes will float. And they'll protect people's feet from decomposing.
Technically running shoes are not part of the plane.
BobG said:Running shoes will float. And they'll protect people's feet from decomposing.
Topher925 said:What parts of an airplane float besides the seat cushions?
moose said:Can it be conspiracy time now?
Ivan Seeking said:How much do you want to bet that the alien abduction theories are already brewing?
Ivan Seeking said:How much do you want to bet that the alien abduction theories are already brewing?
IT'S JUST LIKE IN THE X-FILES!
moose said:I can only hope that someday the history channel will be on with some show about abductions and that they will talk about this.
"In 2009 Air France flight 447 suddenly disappeared with no warning. Not a shred of it has ever been found. Planes just don't disappear, there HAD to have been extraterrestrial involvement. A few pilots recalled seeing a bright flash of light around the time of the flights disappearance. I have no doubt in my mind that the plane was abducted by aliens"
Ivan Seeking said:I don't know if you have ever watched the UFO Hunters, but that one guy with the dark glasses and a hat... I think his name is Bill, is actually just that bad! I swear, he is the definitive example of a UFO NUT! Yes indeed, if they don't find the plane, I would put money down that we could easily predict a half dozen conspiracy theories... not to say that we should. But it is all so painfully predictable.
Evo said:I have to say if there was no doubt they died, a body would be meaningless. It would only be an issue if the person had just "disappeared" and there was no evidence that they were dead.
Phrak said:You've unwittingly identified the key issue. There is always a doubt. It gnaws at the soul. It consumes ones time in endless, depressing speculation. This is the thing for which the word 'closure' has come to represent the end of.
Now I understand this word.
Phrak said:You've unwittingly identified the key issue. There is always a doubt. It gnaws at the soul. It consumes ones time in endless, depressing speculation. This is the thing for which the word 'closure' has come to represent the end of.
Now I understand this word.
lisab said:But if you had a family member on that flight, would you have doubt that your loved one was dead?
I wouldn't.
Edit: looks like a funny thing to say when you read my signature :rofl: but I stand by it.
moose said:If the plane was never found at all, then I would probably have doubts despite knowing otherwise. If the plane debris was found, then all doubt would be gone.
Cyrus said:Why would you have doubts: are there magical islands in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Also, how many people survive a crash from 35k + feet?
Cyrus said:Why would you have doubts: are there magical islands in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Also, how many people survive a crash from 35k + feet?
Cyrus said:Why would you have doubts: are there magical islands in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Also, how many people survive a crash from 35k + feet?
Cardoso said a large oil slick spotted by search plane pilots was not from the Airbus, but that another slick of kerosene found may have been from the downed passenger jet.
"The oil was not from the plane because there wasn't oil of that quantity (on the plane) to cause that slick," he said.
Moonbear said:without fresh water, time has run out.
Cyrus said:Why would you have doubts: are there magical islands in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Also, how many people survive a crash from 35k + feet?
Office_Shredder said:Ok, wait. From what I understand an oil slick was found with the debris, but was determined to possibly be too large to be from the Airbus. Where the heck did it come from then? I can maybe understand a ship chucking stuff overboard, but you wouldn't dump oil in the middle of the ocean
I'm calling BS on that one.Borek said:
He found a raft with food and water in it. Lucky him.
They also had food and water.
Typically, when people are looking for "closure", it is due to an absence of evidence of anything to indicate a crash (or whatever). When someone just plain disappears, you have no idea what happened to them, so it isn't that unreasonable to hold out some hope. This is why it is so hard for the families of abduction victims. Even though the odds say that after a certain amount of time, they are probably dead, it isn't unreasonable to continue looking for them.BobG said:Actually, there are occasional survivors - Plane Fall Survivor Backs Serb Reformers.
Bodies and debris have been found from the Air France plane which went missing over the Atlantic last Monday, the Brazilian air force has said...
BobG said:You just need to know how to fall from an airplane. Actually, there are occasional survivors - Plane Fall Survivor Backs Serb Reformers.
# Survey landing locations.No parachute, eh? Bummer. Okay, now look down and take a good look at the ground. This may be frightening -- DON'T PANIC. If there are any bodies of water below, you want to steer clear of them. Water is the worst thing to hit. Look especially for hills -- the best way to land is by rolling down a hill. Large inflated crash mats are great, too, but chances are you won't find any handy.
People illegally dump waste in the ocean all the time. In fact, that's one of the causes of the Somali pirate problem.
Not two incidents. The report I saw said was that it was flotsam that had been floating around for years. Just more junk that we've dumped into the sea.Moonbear said:It depends on the family. For some, they just can't process that the person is really dead and let go of the hope that they might instead be crash landed on a deserted island and living out their own version of Gilligan's Island or Lost if they don't find a body...or at least confirm that the plane really wrecked.
Though, I hope they're carefully examining that NONE of that wreckage is from 447. A mid-air collision with an unregistered flight in an area without radar coverage is certainly more plausible as a reason for a crash than a lightning strike, or it's also possible that dumb luck landed the plane on a boat or ship when it hit the water, and debris are from something struck by the plane in addition to the plane. Otherwise, it seems there are not one, but two incidents to investigate...a bad enough storm to down a jet could have also capsized a boat in the same area (the flash someone else reported could have been a signal flare).
I'll grant that there is some chance the plane could have survived, but there are a lot of "even if's" to those scenarios: The searchers do know where to start looking and even better, life rafts have emergency locator beacons in them! So even if the plane survived the impact and the rescuers were looking in the wrong place and the locator beacons didn't work, but they still got food into the raft and the raft didn't capsize due to the weather...that's just too many "even ifs" to be reasonable.Moonbear said:The doubt is that without finding any evidence of debris from the plane, and with no radar coverage or communication from the flight after some sort of electrical fault, nobody knows that it just suddenly fell from the sky...that's an assumption that it crashed from 35k feet. There can remain doubt that it managed to glide into the water intact and there are survivors floating around in a life raft that hasn't been found yet (not an easy thing to find when you don't even know where to start looking). Though, we also know that even in that sort of "best case" scenario, without fresh water, time has run out. That won't stop the relatives of the victims from holding out hope longer.
Oh, well that kinda changes the "even if" scenarios...cristo said:Apparently bodies have now been found from the crashed plane: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8087303.stm
russ_watters said:I'm glad they found it - it really would have been awful if they never had.
[The Brasilian air force spokesman] later added that two male bodies had been found, as well as objects linked to passengers known to be on the flight, including a suitcase with a plane ticket.
russ_watters said:At the very least, drinking small amounts of seawater won't kill a healthy person, but it will harm them. For someone who is dying of thirst it will only serve to hasten their death. He found a raft with food and water in it. Lucky him.
They also had food and water.
I'm not, but without some to get them started, they are unlikely to have lasted long enough to have figured out how to catch fish without fishing gear and collect their own water (assuming the weather provides you with rain in time to collect it). That second guy had 10 gallons, about enough for 20 days.Borek said:...seems like you are suggesting in both cases they had enough food and water to survive several months on the raft. They had not. By all means they should be dead in a days or weeks at most.
To me, that logic sounds a lot like the logic lottery players use. It just isn't reasonable.Besides, what I am aiming at is that people can survive much longer than one may expect, so saying already that their time has run out is premature.
BobG said:You just need to know how to fall from an airplane. Actually, there are occasional survivors...
russ_watters said:To me, that logic sounds a lot like the logic lottery players use. It just isn't reasonable.
It's now reported here -cristo said:I agree. From what the link above now says (the BBC write evolving pages for news stories, so this has just appeared) there seems to be no doubt this time around:
. . . .
The two male bodies were recovered Saturday morning about 70 kilometers (45 miles) south of where Air France Flight 447 emitted its last signals — roughly 400 miles (640 kilometers) northeast of the Fernando de Noronha islands off Brazil's northern coast.
Brazilian air force spokesman Col. Jorge Amaral said an Air France ticket was found inside a leather briefcase.
"It was confirmed with Air France that the ticket number corresponds to a passenger on the flight," he said.
Admiral Edison Lawrence said the bodies were being transported to the Fernando de Noronha islands for identification. A backpack with a vaccination card also was recovered.
The finds could potentially establish a more precise search area for the crucial black box flight recorders that could tell investigators why the jet crashed, although Brazilian authorities refused to comment on implications for the search.
Investigators have been searching a zone of several hundred square miles (square kilometers) for debris. A blue plane seat with a serial number on it has been recovered — but officials were still trying to confirm with Air France that it was a seat belonging to Flight 477.
. . . .
Even the large oil slick? What carries more fuel/oil than a jet flying a transAtlantic trip short of an oil tanker? A fishing vessel with barrels of fuel on board maybe? If it was just debris, garbage tossed overboard or whatever would have seemed totally reasonable to me, but I thought it was the oil slick that got their attention most, leading them to think it was a wreckage.HallsofIvy said:Not two incidents. The report I saw said was that it was flotsam that had been floating around for years. Just more junk that we've dumped into the sea.
russ_watters said:I'll grant that there is some chance the plane could have survived, but there are a lot of "even if's" to those scenarios: The searchers do know where to start looking and even better, life rafts have emergency locator beacons in them! So even if the plane survived the impact and the rescuers were looking in the wrong place and the locator beacons didn't work, but they still got food into the raft and the raft didn't capsize due to the weather...that's just too many "even ifs" to be reasonable.
I don't think grieving people are that completely irrational that they would hold out much hope against such odds.
russ_watters said:I'm calling BS on that one.
At the very least, drinking small amounts of seawater won't kill a healthy person, but it will harm them. For someone who is dying of thirst it will only serve to hasten their death.