DEC with E/M and scalar fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that electromagnetism and minimally coupled scalar field theories satisfy the Dominant Energy Condition (DEC). The user seeks assistance in verifying the conditions T_{\mu\nu} T^\nu_{\ \lambda} t^\mu t^\lambda ≤ 0 and T_{\mu\nu} t^\mu t^\nu ≥ 0 for timelike vectors t^\mu. The specific form of the energy-momentum tensor for the minimally coupled scalar field is provided as T_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_\mu \phi \nabla_\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\nabla^\sigma \phi \nabla_\sigma \phi - g_{\mu\nu}V(\phi). The discussion also highlights the forum's rules regarding posting homework problems, emphasizing the need for users to show their work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dominant Energy Condition (DEC)
  • Familiarity with energy-momentum tensors in field theory
  • Knowledge of minimally coupled scalar field theory
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the Dominant Energy Condition (DEC)
  • Study the properties of energy-momentum tensors in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of scalar field theories in cosmology
  • Learn about the role of potentials in scalar field theories, specifically V(\phi)
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone studying general relativity and field theories who seeks to understand the implications of the Dominant Energy Condition.

blendecho
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to show that electromagnetism and scalar field theories satisfy the DEC. I know how to find T_{\mu\nu} and all that and what I have to show (T_{\mu\nu} T^\nu_{\ \lambda} t^\mu t^\lambda\leq 0 and T_{\mu\nu} t^\mu t^\nu\geq 0 for timelike t^\mu), but I'm having trouble getting started.

Thanks!

(Edit: Make that just the minimally coupled scalar field theory, T_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_\mu \phi \nabla_\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\nabla^\sigma \phi \nabla_\sigma \phi - g_{\mu\nu}V(\phi) for some positive potential)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a homework problem, correct? (There is a special PF forum with special rules for these.)
 
It's a former homework problem, I wasn't satisfied with my solution.
 
So, what did you try in your attempt?
 
Chris Hillman said:
This is a homework problem, correct? (There is a special PF forum with special rules for these.)

That applies to undergraduate homework problems. Graduate homework problems can optionally be posted to the main forums. But it is still required to show one's work.

To quote the relevant section from the rules (I should add for people new to the forum that one can click on the link named "rules" to see the current PF rules)

On posting questions: Any and all high school and undergraduate homework assignments or textbook style exercises for which you are seeking assistance are to be posted in the appropriate forum in our Homework & Coursework Questions area.This should be done whether or not the problem is part of one's coursework. The reason for this is that the scientific and mathematical sections of Physics Forums are to be reserved for discussions and not academic assistance. Since graduate level assignments are meant to be more thought provoking (and hence more worthy of discussion), graduate level questions will be allowed in the relevant part of the main section of PF, provided that the graduate student attempts the problem and shows his work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K