A Decay of polarized particle into two spinless

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter moss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Particle
moss
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
Hi All, I want to understand the decay of a spin-1 massive vector particle into two spinless massive particles.

Given a massive vector particle V with spin Sz = +1, 0, -1 decays into 2 massive spinless particles. I have to compute the amplitude M but I don't know what should I do with the polarization vectors?

Hence my Qs. is that, does the Sz vectors becomes the polarization vectors?
is the angular momentum and/or Sz conserve?

I am kind of al-confuso because never did any polarized photon-less decay before.
any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a concrete model at hand? The calculation can be done in the usual way using Feynman rules. Usually you are interested in the unpolarized cross section, i.e., you average ##|\mathcal{M}_{fi}|^2## over the polarization states of the decaying vector particles in the initial state.
 
vanhees71 said:
Do you have a concrete model at hand? The calculation can be done in the usual way using Feynman rules. Usually you are interested in the unpolarized cross section, i.e., you average ##|\mathcal{M}_{fi}|^2## over the polarization states of the decaying vector particles in the initial state.

Thanks for the reply,
so e.g for Sz=1 what polarization vector should I use assuming the axis is z.?
 
Okay the original Qs. with V=vector particle and S1 & S2 are spinless is that;

Let V--->S1S2 in the rest frame with S1 emitted in the x-z plane at and angle theta respect to z-axis.
show that the decay rates for polarization states of V with spin Sz=+1,-1,0 along the z-direction
are proportional to sin^2(theta) and cos^2(theta) respectively.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top