Schools Deciding what to specialize in for grad school

AI Thread Summary
Entering the junior year of a physics degree raises concerns about selecting a graduate program, especially as interests expand rather than narrow. The focus is on theoretical physics, with interests in atmospheric physics, climate science, astronomy/astrophysics, particle physics, and nuclear engineering, while materials science has been ruled out. Many students find clarity in their specialization during their junior year as they engage with advanced classes, which often helps in identifying what excites them. A key strategy for narrowing down options includes exploring current research topics and assessing long-term fascination with potential fields. The discussion highlights the challenge of making a decision amidst numerous interests, particularly balancing pure physics with fields that have a direct societal impact, such as green technologies. The importance of gaining exposure to various subjects before committing to a specific graduate path is emphasized, as many students do not finalize their choices until they experience the coursework firsthand.
Jack21222
Messages
209
Reaction score
1
I'm heading into my junior year of a physics degree, which means I have about one more year to decide on what graduate programs to apply to.

The thing that scares me, though, is that the more I learn, the harder it is for me to narrow down what I want to do.

So far, I'm more interested in theory than experiment, and I think I've eliminated materials science.

Some topics I'm interested in include atmospheric physics, climate science, astronomy/astrophysics, particle physics, and nuclear engineering. This is not an all-inclusive list. Things like geophysics interest me, but I haven't looked into that as much.

For those of you who went (or are currently going) to grad school, at what point did you decide on what programs to apply for? Did you have a good idea by your junior year? Did you kinda just wing it as you went along? Did you apply to a bunch and just specialize in whatever you were accepted to?

A second question is what are some methods of narrowing it down?

I don't want to be paralyzed by too many choices.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the things too consider when deciding which specific field of study to enter into when going into graduate school is which excites you? After years of working in that field will you still be intrigued? If not then you should reconsider what field you wish to enter. You can also gather information on the current research topics and if they fascinate you then that certain study is suitable for you.
 
I think my problem is that everything fascinates me, but I have trouble predicting what will fascinate me for the longest period of time.
 
Look at the papers on arXiv you will get a clearer idea of what is being researched and what is the most active since fascination is a commonality it's better to choose the more active area of research, only an opinon.
 
I think a lot of schools are structured so that you don't get to take a lot of electives and advanced classes in your major until junior and senior years. I had no idea what I wanted to specialize in after sophomore year, but during junior year, taking more advanced classes in my major led me to figure out what I want to specialize in. Of course plenty of people know what they want to specialize in before they formally take any classes in that field, but many don't until they actually see which classes they enjoy and which classes they don't.
 
sweetpotato said:
I think a lot of schools are structured so that you don't get to take a lot of electives and advanced classes in your major until junior and senior years. I had no idea what I wanted to specialize in after sophomore year, but during junior year, taking more advanced classes in my major led me to figure out what I want to specialize in. Of course plenty of people know what they want to specialize in before they formally take any classes in that field, but many don't until they actually see which classes they enjoy and which classes they don't.

Thanks, sweetpotato. Hopefully, I'll come up with a better idea in the next two semesters. Right now, I'm kinda torn between wanting to do "pure" physics and doing something that will have a more direct impact on society in one of the many "green" fields.

If I take a step away from physics into a related field, I wouldn't have had a chance to take any real courses in that field before just jumping into grad school.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top