Decoherence And What happens in reality

the_pulp
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
I know that the theoretical decoherence mechanism makes the density mattrix diagonal, but my question is if that happens in real life. I mean, let's take the hidrogen atom (lets work in the QM framework And not in the QFT framework in order to have multiple stationary states) And suppose that the electron is in a superposition of energy/stationary states. In this case, does in real life the electron, through the interaction with the environment, spontaneously "choose" one of those stationary states or it remains in a superposition of energy states?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we do not know, there are theories but we lack experimental proof.
 
I don't think a hydrogen atom is a good example. An artifical qubit would be a better system to study since it then clear what the "classical" state would be (this is never obvious for an atom).

In the latter case then yes, that is pretty much what happens. Due to decoherence, a system that is initially in a superposition of states will end up permanently in ONE of those states.

There are experiments where people have traced out the "trajectory" of a qubit on a Bloch sphere, and this can be used as a nice illustration of this.
 
The superposition you mention is a superposition of Energy states, right?

Thanks
 
the_pulp said:
(lets work in the QM framework And not in the QFT framework in order to have multiple stationary states)
I'm not sure if decoherence is possible if we have strictly stationary states in the system. Usually, the interaction with the environment causes both decoherence and relaxation. The time scale for decoherence is just much much shorter for most environments.

the_pulp said:
[...] suppose that the electron is in a superposition of energy/stationary states. In this case, does in real life the electron, through the interaction with the environment, spontaneously "choose" one of those stationary states or it remains in a superposition of energy states?
The final state of the system is a mixed state. This means that the probability to find the system in any of the states of the initial superposition remains unchanged. I don't think that we should say that it is in only one of them, see also below.

f95toli said:
In the latter case then yes, that is pretty much what happens. Due to decoherence, a system that is initially in a superposition of states will end up permanently in ONE of those states.
I tend to disagree. Consider a Bell state of two entangled qubits. We wouldn't think of a single qubit as having one definite state here. But the reduced density matrix is the same as for a qubit which has undergone decoherence. I don't think that it should matter wether the qubit is entangled with another qubit or with the environment.
 
kith said:
The final state of the system is a mixed state. This means that the probability to find the system in any of the states of the initial superposition remains unchanged. I don't think that we should say that it is in only one of them, see also below.

Yea - but just to elaborate - decoherence transforms a superposition into an improper mixed state. The difference here is that mixed states are usually interpreted as a system where a randomly selected state is given for observation. If that was the case for the mixed states of decoherence then low and behold the measurement problem would be solved, you are observing a reality that exists prior to observation and everything is sweet. But it was not physically prepared that way so you can't do that - bummer - that's why its called improper - Schlosshauer carefully explains it in his book on Decoherence. But wait - it is both observationally and mathematically exactly the same so what you can do is assume it is like that - no observation or mathematical analysis can prove you wrong. This is the simple assumption I make. Other ways of using it exist eg Decoherent Histories and Many Worlds. Many worlds is particularly neat - nothing happens - the mixed state simply keeps evolving but each state of the ensemble is considered a separate world. You can read about Decoherent Histories here:
http://quantum.phys.cmu.edu/CHS/histories.html

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top