Decomposers and Non-Biodegradable Substances: Impact on Soil Ecosystems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Docscientist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The presence of non-biodegradable substances, particularly plastics, negatively impacts decomposers in soil ecosystems by obstructing their ability to perform essential life processes like respiration and nutrition. Unlike sand, which is non-biodegradable but does not hinder decomposers, plastics take millions of years to degrade and create environmental issues such as foul odors and congestion. The chemical composition of plastics may also be harmful to decomposers, complicating their ability to break down organic matter. Discussions highlight that while some materials can coexist in soil without detrimental effects, non-biodegradable substances like plastics pose significant challenges. Overall, the interaction between decomposers and non-biodegradable materials is complex and detrimental to soil health.
Docscientist
Messages
101
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


How are decomposers affected by the presence of non biodegradable substances in the soil?
2. Homework Equations [/B]
None

The Attempt at a Solution


I think decomposers do not get a place to stay when their place(soil) is full of plastics.Maybe they can't perform their life process like respiration,nutrition etc..in the presence of such substances that cannot be broken down.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sand is not biodegradable as well, yet its presence in the soils is not a problem.
 
Borek said:
Sand is not biodegradable as well, yet its presence in the soils is not a problem.
Plastics can't be broken down and they take millions of years to degrade which means decomposers find it difficult to break the bonds in plastics.This might be harmful for the environment since they settle in one place and give rise to foul smell and conjustion.
But still decomposers themselves being affected in the process of breaking them down looks little complicated.
 
Docscientist said:
Plastics can't be broken down and they take millions of years to degrade which means decomposers find it difficult to break the bonds

Same about sand.

Docscientist said:
they settle in one place and give rise to foul smell

Foul smell means decomposition products, so they are either smelly and decomposing, or stable and not decomposing, they can't be both at the same time.
 
Docscientist said:
Plastics can't be broken down and they take millions of years to degrade which means decomposers find it difficult to break the bonds in plastics.This might be harmful for the environment since they settle in one place and give rise to foul smell and conjustion.
But still decomposers themselves being affected in the process of breaking them down looks little complicated.
Borek said:
Same about sand.
Foul smell means decomposition products, so they are either smelly and decomposing, or stable and not decomposing, they can't be both at the same time.
I think plastics are composed of certain chemicals which are harmful to decomposers.
 
Docscientist said:
I think plastics are composed of certain chemicals which are harmful to decomposers.

In some cases definitely yes. You just can't freely mix both things - stability and decompositions products - as properties of the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes Docscientist
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top