Decomposition of irrep. of G_2 into irreps. of A_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter timb00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
timb00
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

this is the first thread of mine. I try to recover the decomposition of
the fundamental representation (the 7) of G2 into irreducible representations of
A_2. It is given by

7 = 3 + \bar {3}[\tex] + 1<br /> <br /> It maid be that I didn&#039;t understand the procedure, founded by Dynkin, to use the <br /> extended Dynkin diagram. <br /> <br /> o<u>==</u>o--o<br /> a1 a2 ax<br /> <br /> Where the last root is the extension. The weights of the 7 are :<br /> <br /> {1, 2}, <br /> {1, 1},<br /> {0, 1}, <br /> {0, 0}, <br /> {0, -1}, <br /> {-1, -1}, <br /> {-1, -2}<br /> <br /> I&#039;am using the Cartan subalgebra {a2,ax} to embed the A_2 in G_2. I think that this is<br /> the point where I do a mistake? Maybe someone could help me with the decompostion.<br /> <br /> Thanks for reading<br /> <br /> Timb00
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can take a look at Fulton and Harris book "Representation Theory", lecture 22. It is about the Lie algebra \mathfrak g_2 and includes the branching law that you ask about.
 
Hey Guy's,

thanks for reading my thread. I found my mistake. It was just the wrong normalization.
If someone is interested I will make a sketch how I compute the weight projector.

For the A_2 I take the Cartan sub algebra to be generated out of {a'1,a'2}={4/3*a2,4/3*ax}. The factor of 4/3 is because of the normalization. Now it is possible to get two independent equations :

(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2) (a'1) =4/3(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2)(a2)=(n_1 a'_1 + n_2 a'_2)(a'1)
<=> 4/3(m_2 1/4-m_1/8) = n_1 1/3 - n_2 1/6

and

(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2) (a'2) =4/3(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2)(ax)=(n_1 a'_1 + n_2 a'_2)(a'2)
<=> 4/3(m_2 1/4) = n_2 1/3 - n_1 1/6

In matrix notation one finds :

A(m_1,m_2)^T = B (n_1,m_2)^T <=> P (m_1,m_2)^T = (n_1,m_2)^T

=> P = B^-1A

If one acts with P on the weights one findes that the set of G_2 weights decompose into
a 3 + {\bar 3} +1 .

Thanks, timb00.

P.s : hey martinbn, thanks for your answer. I saw it after I wrote the text. But I will have
a look into the Fulton.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
8K
2
Replies
93
Views
15K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top