Decomposition of N2O5 Entropy Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying calculations related to the decomposition of N2O5 and its entropy equilibrium. The original poster expresses confusion over a complex formula for Kp and seeks assistance, noting that the problems should align with exam expectations. The reaction is identified as endothermic, suggesting that increasing temperature will favor the forward reaction. Corrections to the calculations are provided, leading to a final concentration of 0.0147M for x. The poster also shares attempts to calculate DGnaught and Kp at different temperatures, receiving confirmation that their approach is correct.
yolo123
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Please see attached picture.
I need verification of my answers. I unfortunately found these problems on an old book with no answer. I would really appreciate it.

(a) Ok. For this one, I am really not sure. PLEASE help.
I get a very complicated formula.

(1+x)(x^4)/(1-x)^2=Kp.

Now, this makes no sense because I am not able to solve more than quadratics. This book should represent problems I could see on exams where they do not expect me to do more than quadratics. What do I do?

(b) DG=DGnaught+RTln(Q)
Q=Kp so DG=0.
DGnaught=28058J
DGnaught=DH-TDS.
DS=258mol/K.

(c) Reaction is endothermic. Adding temperature will make reaction go forward more.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 10.57.17 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 10.57.17 PM.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 1,296
Physics news on Phys.org
Part (a) does not look like it was set up correctly. If x is the final pressure of the NO2, the final pressure of the O2 is 1+x/4, and the final pressure of the final pressure of the N2O5 is 1-x/2. I guess you have to assume that the container is operating at constant volume.

Assume that x is small compared to 1, and see what you get. If you feel that you need to get better accuracy, solve by successive substitutions.

Chet
 
Chet, I corrected the situation:
I get a final x of 0.0147M. Please check my math.
(1+x)((4x)^4)/(1-2x)^2=Kp

Thank you so much.
 
Last edited:
I will post another problem on this thread. I do not want to overcrowd the forum with my "pollution."
 
Here is my attempt: calculate DGnaught using values (final - initial).
Calculate Kp noting that DG=0. So -DGnaught=RTln(Kp).
Use Clausius Clapeyron law to find new Kp at other temperature.

Kp 298K: 5.29x10^34
Kp 345K: 8.61x10^29
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.57.11 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.57.11 PM.png
    21.5 KB · Views: 1,019
yolo123 said:
Here is my attempt: calculate DGnaught using values (final - initial).
Calculate Kp noting that DG=0. So -DGnaught=RTln(Kp).
Use Clausius Clapeyron law to find new Kp at other temperature.

Kp 298K: 5.29x10^34
Kp 345K: 8.61x10^29
Your approach is correct. I haven't checked your arithmetic, or your use of units.

Chet
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top