Decreasing Ambient Heat w/ Heat Sink

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dryerasethis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing
AI Thread Summary
A heat sink placed in a sealed container will initially absorb heat as the ambient temperature rises, but it will quickly reach thermal equilibrium with the ambient, reducing its efficiency in heat absorption. In traditional applications, heat sinks can dissipate heat into the atmosphere, which acts as an infinite heat sink, unlike the sealed environment. If a method is implemented to transfer heat from the heat sink externally, it could reverse the roles of the air and heat sink. The effectiveness of this setup depends on the design of the heat sink, as not all shapes are optimal for both absorption and dissipation. Ultimately, the heat sink's performance will be influenced by its ability to transfer heat out of the sealed system.
Dryerasethis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is a short conceptual question.

If I place a heat sink in a sealed container, and than raise the ambient temperature in the container, will the heat sink absorb the heat with somewhere close to the same efficiency as it would being used in the traditional application (dispersing it's heat into the ambient)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps initially, but very quickly, the heat sink will have the same temperature as the ambient, and there won't be any effective absorption anymore.

In the traditional application, this situation is never attained, because the heat sink can always radiate to the ambient, which itself transfers heat to the practically infinite atmosphere (the true "heat sink").
 
But the heat sink is going to absorb the excess heat in the ambient? And so if I have a way to transfer the heat sink's heat out of the system externally I could effectively reverse the roles of the air and the heat sink in their traditional applications?

Thanks for answering!
 
Last edited:
Yes, a heat sink works basically the same whether absorbing or dissipating heat.
 
Sure, heat naturally goes from hot to cold if transfer is possible (whether by conduction, convection or radiation), and generally, the more surface the better. The way you choose to transfer the heat from the heat sink out of the system is practically a leak in your otherwise sealed container.

There are many designs to heat sinks though, and I can't confirm which shape is better for your particular system. The optimal heatsink (shape for instance) for emitting in the atmosphere isn't necessarily the best for your inverted application.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top