Decreasing Order of Stability in unsaturated 6C Rings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability order of unsaturated 6C rings, with participants evaluating different stability rankings. The proposed stability orders include IV>I>II>III and IV>II>I>III, with a focus on hyperconjugation effects influencing the stability of structures I and II. The consensus leans towards option A being correct, as exocyclic double bonds are less stable in six-membered rings compared to internal double bonds. Additionally, Brown's Hypothesis is introduced, stating that exocyclic double bonds are more reactive in six-membered rings but more stable in five-membered rings. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of stability assessments in organic chemistry.
AGNuke
Gold Member
Messages
455
Reaction score
9
Decreasing Stability order of given I, II, III, IV (in order)
cho2.png


A)IV>I>II>III
B)I>IV>III>II
C)I>II>IV>III
D)IV>II>I>III (My Answer)

Since the IV is most stable, only A and D answers are worth checking. They only differ by stability order of I and II.

Then I checked by determining their stability due to hyperconjugation. I has HC3 while II has HC4, hence my answer D. But the correct answer is A. Any suggestions, whether my answer or provided answer is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's A). Exocyclic double bonds are less stable than internal double bonds for 6-member rings but exocyclic double bonds are more stable than internal double bonds for 5-member rings.

Have you heard of Brown's Hypothesis?
 
Never heard of it. I doubt about this knowledge shared in 12th standard, even more so considering the standard of education I've been provided here. I would be grateful if you were to enlighten me briefly on how this hypothesis is established.

Still, as a last resort, I tried using my old habit of giving bluff explanation to support the answer (even if it isn't :-p) and drew out the structures possible in Hyperconjugation

For I
HC1.png


For II
HC2.png


Since I has 6 structure while II has 5 structures, I is more stable :biggrin: (I know I am talented :blushing:)
 
Brown's hypothesis simply states that exocyclic double bonds to six-member rings are more reactive than double bonds inside the ring and double bonds exocyclic to a five-member ring are more stable than those within the five-member ring. This is supported by reactivity data.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top