Define/explain this gravity calculation (picture)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a request for a detailed explanation of a gravity calculation related to Newton's law of gravity. The calculation illustrates that the gravitational force between two masses is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. It is emphasized that while both objects experience the same gravitational force, their accelerations differ if their masses are unequal. The conversation also touches on the simplification of objects to point sources for easier conceptualization. Overall, the focus is on clarifying the fundamental principles of gravitational force and acceleration.
nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Im trying to write something up, and I want a more detailed explanation of this calculation (image below) - Can anyone give it a go? Thanks in advance

GMM.jpg



I am trying to find a graphic/image that best suits calculations that have to do with acceleration and gravity, so if anyone has one, please do share! THanks

P.S. - This is not a homework question

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That is an incredibly simple 'calculation,' its basically just a definition. You're going to have to be more specific on what you're looking for.
 
The picture is simply a description of Newton's law of gravity.
 
it says that the force due to gravity each ball experiences is equal to the product of their masses over the square of the distance separating them.

note that each object experiences the same force but does not experiences the same acceleration IF they are of different masses.
 
It is easier to conceptualize if you reduce them to point sources, which is the usual practice.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top