Define the complex number Z = u^v

Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

u(r, θ) = ?
v(r, θ) = ?

And the inverse too:

r(u, v) = ?
θ(u, v) = ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bruno Tolentino said:
If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

u(r, θ) = ?
v(r, θ) = ?

And the inverse too:

r(u, v) = ?
θ(u, v) = ?
Have you looked at this article?

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexExponentiation.html
 
I don't understand your question. You ask, apparently, for z in terms of "u" and "v" but have not said what "u" and "v" are! Are you referring to the representation of a complex function as "z(x+ iy)= u(x,y)+ iv(x,y)" where u and v are real valued function of the real variables x and y? If so then z= re^{i\theta} is NOT "u^v". z= re^{i\theta}= r(cos(\theta)+ isin(\theta) so that u= r cos(\theta) and v= r sin(\theta).
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

u(r, θ) = ?
v(r, θ) = ?

And the inverse too:

r(u, v) = ?
θ(u, v) = ?
I'm not sure what you are looking for, but u=re^{i\theta},\ v=1 works.
However there are an infinite number of possibilities, by using u=r^ne^{ni\theta}\ and\ v=\frac{1}{n}.
 
Z is a complex number, u is a real number and v is a real number too. Is just another way of express the complex numbers...

So, is possible convert the expression z = x + i y in z = uv ? Is possible express u and v in terms of x and y?
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
So, is possible convert the expression z = x + i y in z = uv ? Is possible express u and v in terms of x and y?
Well, let's try. You know that z=x+iy can also be expressed as z=re^{i\phi}, where r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} and \phi = \arcsin(\frac{y}{r}). Therefore, we obviously have z=e^{\ln r}\cdot e^{i\phi}= e^{\ln r + i\phi}. ...
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Tolentino
Yeah! I thought this... but, I was unsatisfied com this 'conversion' and so I posted my doubt here because the most experiente could see something better...

Anyway! Thank you!
 
Back
Top