Given that 1/x is symetric across y=x, why can't we say \int^1_0 1/x - x dx= \int^\infty_1 1/x + x dx? Geometrically, it makes sense, but ln(0) is clearly undefined.
from 1 to infinity the integral is unboundedly large. ln(x) tends to -infinity as x tends to 0, so the other integral is also unboundedly large. I think there's nothing wrong with saying the areas are equal
#3
TylerH
729
0
Yeah... I should have waited to post. I solved it and got x=0, but I'm not sure that means anything...
I'm reviewing Meirovitch's "Methods of Analytical Dynamics," and I don't understand the commutation of the derivative from r to dr:
$$
\mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = m \ddot{\mathbf{r}} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = m\mathbf{\dot{r}} \cdot d\mathbf{\dot{r}}
$$